Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34798899›Full record

Observational studyBMC women's health2021

Can biopsies be omitted after normal colposcopy in women referred with low-grade cervical cytology? A prospective cohort study.

Mette Mindedahl Jespersen, Berit Bargum Booth, Lone Kjeld Petersen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC women's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04249856 (Does Dynamic Spectral Imaging), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04249856 unknown statusnot on this map

Does Dynamic Spectral Imaging (DSI) Colposcopy Improve the Diagnostics of Cervical Dysplasia Compared to Standard Colposcopy

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2017 to 2020Enrolled3,000ConditionsCervical Dysplasia, Cervical Disease, Cervical Lesion, Cervix CancerArmsDynamic Spectral Imaging (DYSIS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mette Mindedahl JespersenUniversity of Southern Denmark, SDU, Odense, Denmark. mettemindedahl@gmail.com.
Berit Bargum BoothDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Lone Kjeld PetersenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKRegional Hospital Randers · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundControversy surrounds whether women with low-risk cytology screening results but a normal colposcopic assessment should have random biopsies taken. The aim of this study was to determine the yield of CIN2+ from one to four cervical biopsies in women with cytology of LSIL or ASCUS and a normal colposcopic impression.

methodsBetween January 2017 and September 2020, women over 18 years old referred for colposcopic examination due to either an abnormal smear (ASCUS+) or follow-up after previous cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) were invited to participate in the study. All study participants underwent colposcopic examination and had four biopsies taken. The biopsies were analyzed separately.

resultsIn total, 1327 women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results or attending follow-up after a previous CIN diagnosis were enrolled in the study and examined by colposcopy. Of these, 173 were newly referred with cytology of LSIL or ASCUS and had a normal colposcopic impression and four adequate biopsies. Of these, 22.0% were diagnosed with CIN2+. When combining the results of the four biopsies, we found a 100% relative increase in CIN2+ cases compared to using only one biopsy (from 11.0% to 22.0%, P = 0.006).

conclusionAs we found CIN2+ from random cervical biopsies in 22.0% of women with cytology of LSIL or ASCUS who had a normal colposcopic impression, we advocate performing four random cervical biopsies at the squamocolumnar junction in such women. Trial registration NCT04249856, January 31 2020 (retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdolescentBiopsyColposcopyEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesVaginal SmearsAtypical squamous cells of the cervixBiopsyCervical intraepithelial neoplasiaColposcopyConizationDiagnosisPrecancerous conditionsSquamous intraepithelial lesions

Identifiers

PMID34798899
PMCPMC8603470
OpenAlexW3213983984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.