Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34798896›Full record

ReviewThrombosis journal2021

Impact of oral anticoagulation therapy on postoperative atrial fibrillation outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mariana Fragão-Marques, Francisco Teixeira, Jennifer Mancio, Nair Seixas, João Rocha-Neves, Inês Falcão-Pires, Adelino Leite-Moreira

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Thrombosis journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. 2024 Literature Review of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation: A Surgeon's Perspective.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Subclinical postoperative atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mariana Fragão-MarquesCardiovascular Research and Development Center, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, 4200, Porto, Portugal. marianaifrm@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1236-0233
Francisco TeixeiraFaculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Jennifer MancioCardiovascular Research and Development Center, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, 4200, Porto, Portugal.
Nair SeixasVila Nova de Gaia Hospital Center, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
João Rocha-NevesSão João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
Inês Falcão-PiresCardiovascular Research and Development Center, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, 4200, Porto, Portugal.
Adelino Leite-MoreiraCardiovascular Research and Development Center, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, 4200, Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTCentro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most common complication after cardiac surgery. Recent studies had shown this phenomenon is no longer considered transitory and is associated with higher risk of thromboembolic events or death. The aim of this study was to systematically review and analyze previous studies comparing oral anticoagulation therapy with no anticoagulation, regarding these long-term outcomes.

methodsPubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Database were systematically searched to identify the studies comparing the risk of stroke, or thromboembolic events or mortality of POAF patients who received anticoagulation compared with those who were not anticoagulated. Incidence of stroke, thromboembolic events and all-cause mortality were evaluated up to 10 years after surgery. Time-to-event outcomes were collected through hazard ratio (HR) along with their variance and the early endpoints using frequencies or odds ratio (OR). Random effect models were used to compute statistical combined measures and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was evaluated through Q statistic-related measures of variance (Tau

resultsEight observational cohort studies were selected, including 15,335 patients (3492 on Oral Anticoagulants (OAC) vs 11,429 without OAC) that met the inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis. Patients had a wide gender distribution (38.6-82.3%), each study with a mean age above 65 years (67.5-85). Vitamin K antagonists were commonly prescribed anticoagulants (74.3-100%). OAC was associated with a protective impact on all-cause mortality at a mean of 5.0 years of follow-up (HR is 0.85 [0.72-1.01]; p = 0.07; I

conclusionCurrent literature suggests a possibly protective impact of OAC therapy for all-cause mortality in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. However, it does not appear to impact thromboembolism rate.

Indexed as

AnticoagulationAtrial fibrillationCardiac surgeryLong-term outcome

Identifiers

PMID34798896
PMCPMC8603521
OpenAlexW3212273715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.