Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34798891›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Out of pocket costs and time/productivity losses for pediatric sepsis in Uganda: a mixed-methods study.

A Krepiakevich, A R Khowaja, O Kabajaasi, B Nemetchek, J M Ansermino, N Kissoon, N K Mugisha, M Tayebwa, J Kabakyenga, M O Wiens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

A KrepiakevichFirst Nations Health Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
A R KhowajaFaculty of Applied Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catherines, Ontario, Canada.
O KabajaasiWalimu, Kampala, Uganda.
B NemetchekCollege of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
J M AnserminoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
N KissoonCenter for International Child Health, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
N K MugishaWalimu, Kampala, Uganda.
M TayebwaMbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
J KabakyengaMbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
M O WiensWalimu, Kampala, Uganda.
Mbarara University of Science and Technology · UGUniversity of British Columbia · CABrock University · CAUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis disproportionately affects children from socioeconomically disadvantaged families in low-resource settings, where care seeking may consume scarce family resources and lead to financial hardships. Those financial hardships may, in turn, contribute to late presentation or failure to seek care and result in high mortality during hospitalization and during the post discharge period, a period of increasingly recognized vulnerability. The purpose of this study is to explore the out-of-pocket costs related to sepsis hospitalizations and post-discharge care among children admitted with sepsis in Uganda.

methodsThis mixed-methods study was comprised of focus group discussions (FGD) with caregivers of children admitted for sepsis, which then informed a quantitative cross-sectional household survey to measure out-of-pocket costs of sepsis care both during initial admission and during the post-discharge period. All participants were families of children enrolled in a concurrent sepsis study.

resultsThree FGD with mothers (n = 20) and one FGD with fathers (n = 7) were conducted. Three primary themes that emerged included (1) financial losses, (2) time and productivity losses and (3) coping with costs. A subsequently developed cross-sectional survey was completed for 153 households of children discharged following admission for sepsis. The survey revealed a high cost of care for families attending both private and public facilities, although out-of-pocket cost were higher at private facilities. Half of those surveyed reported loss of income during hospitalization and a third sold household assets, most often livestock, to cover costs. Total mean out-of-pocket costs of hospital care and post-discharge care were 124.50 USD and 44.60 USD respectively for those seeking initial care at private facilities and 62.10 USD and 14.60 USD at public facilities, a high sum in a country with widespread poverty.

conclusionsThis study reveals that families incur a substantial economic burden in accessing care for children with sepsis.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresSepsisAftercareChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPatient DischargeUganda

Identifiers

PMID34798891
PMCPMC8605527
OpenAlexW3214725424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.