Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34798805›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

Automated annotation of rare-cell types from single-cell RNA-sequencing data through synthetic oversampling.

Saptarshi Bej, Anne-Marie Galow, Robert David, Markus Wolfien, Olaf Wolkenhauer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Leveraging gene correlations in single cell transcriptomic data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Saptarshi BejDepartment of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Rostock, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Anne-Marie GalowInstitute of Genome Biology, Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology, 18196, Dummerstorf, Germany.
Robert DavidDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Markus WolfienDepartment of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Rostock, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Olaf WolkenhauerDepartment of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Rostock, 18057, Rostock, Germany. olaf.wolkenhauer@uni-rostock.de.
University of Rostock · DELeibniz-Institute for Food Systems Biology at the Technical University of Munich · DEResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe research landscape of single-cell and single-nuclei RNA-sequencing is evolving rapidly. In particular, the area for the detection of rare cells was highly facilitated by this technology. However, an automated, unbiased, and accurate annotation of rare subpopulations is challenging. Once rare cells are identified in one dataset, it is usually necessary to generate further specific datasets to enrich the analysis (e.g., with samples from other tissues). From a machine learning perspective, the challenge arises from the fact that rare-cell subpopulations constitute an imbalanced classification problem. We here introduce a Machine Learning (ML)-based oversampling method that uses gene expression counts of already identified rare cells as an input to generate synthetic cells to then identify similar (rare) cells in other publicly available experiments. We utilize single-cell synthetic oversampling (sc-SynO), which is based on the Localized Random Affine Shadowsampling (LoRAS) algorithm. The algorithm corrects for the overall imbalance ratio of the minority and majority class.

resultsWe demonstrate the effectiveness of our method for three independent use cases, each consisting of already published datasets. The first use case identifies cardiac glial cells in snRNA-Seq data (17 nuclei out of 8635). This use case was designed to take a larger imbalance ratio (~1 to 500) into account and only uses single-nuclei data. The second use case was designed to jointly use snRNA-Seq data and scRNA-Seq on a lower imbalance ratio (~1 to 26) for the training step to likewise investigate the potential of the algorithm to consider both single-cell capture procedures and the impact of "less" rare-cell types. The third dataset refers to the murine data of the Allen Brain Atlas, including more than 1 million cells. For validation purposes only, all datasets have also been analyzed traditionally using common data analysis approaches, such as the Seurat workflow.

conclusionsIn comparison to baseline testing without oversampling, our approach identifies rare-cells with a robust precision-recall balance, including a high accuracy and low false positive detection rate. A practical benefit of our algorithm is that it can be readily implemented in other and existing workflows. The code basis in R and Python is publicly available at FairdomHub, as well as GitHub, and can easily be transferred to identify other rare-cell types.

Indexed as

RNASingle-Cell AnalysisAnimalsCluster AnalysisMachine LearningMiceSequence Analysis, RNARNAAutomated cell annotationImbalanced datasetsLoRAS algorithmRare cell type detectionSingle-cell RNA-sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34798805
PMCPMC8603509
OpenAlexW3213087815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.