Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34798580›Full record

ArticleGeneral hospital psychiatry

Longitudinal validation of an electronic health record delirium prediction model applied at admission in COVID-19 patients.

Victor M Castro, Kamber L Hart, Chana A Sacks, Shawn N Murphy, Roy H Perlis, Thomas H McCoy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in General hospital psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Victor M CastroCenter for Quantitative Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Research Information Science and Computing, Mass General Brigham, 399 Revolution Drive, Somerville, MA 02145, USA.
Kamber L HartCenter for Quantitative Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Chana A SacksDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 100 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Shawn N MurphyResearch Information Science and Computing, Mass General Brigham, 399 Revolution Drive, Somerville, MA 02145, USA; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Roy H PerlisCenter for Quantitative Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Thomas H McCoyCenter for Quantitative Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA. Electronic address: thmccoy@partners.org.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USMass General Brigham · US

Funding

Dysregulation of Appetitive & Aversive Amygdala Circuits in Bipolar DisorderR01MH120991 · NIMH · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI BERRETTA, SABINA, MCCARROLL, STEVEN ANDREW · 2020 to 2024
$4.0M
1/2 Leveraging electronic health records for pharmacogenomics of psychiatric disordersR01MH116270 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PERLIS, ROY H. · 2019 to 2022
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116270NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo validate a previously published machine learning model of delirium risk in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

methodUsing data from six hospitals across two academic medical networks covering care occurring after initial model development, we calculated the predicted risk of delirium using a previously developed risk model applied to diagnostic, medication, laboratory, and other clinical features available in the electronic health record (EHR) at time of hospital admission. We evaluated the accuracy of these predictions against subsequent delirium diagnoses during that admission.

resultsOf the 5102 patients in this cohort, 716 (14%) developed delirium. The model's risk predictions produced a c-index of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.73-0.77) with 27.7% of cases occurring in the top decile of predicted risk scores. Model calibration was diminished compared to the initial COVID-19 wave.

conclusionThis EHR delirium risk prediction model, developed during the initial surge of COVID-19 patients, produced consistent discrimination over subsequent larger waves; however, with changing cohort composition and delirium occurrence rates, model calibration decreased. These results underscore the importance of calibration, and the challenge of developing risk models for clinical contexts where standard of care and clinical populations may shift.

Indexed as

COVID-19DeliriumElectronic Health RecordsHospitalizationHumansRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2COVID-19DeliriumElectronic health recordsMachine learningPredictive modelingReplication

Identifiers

PMID34798580
PMCPMC8562039
OpenAlexW3214016298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.