SynthesisAtencion primaria2022
[Euthanasia laws in Spain and in the world: Medical aspects].
Synthesis in Atencion primaria, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative legal and bioethical perspectives on euthanasia and assisted suicide: a systematic review of european frameworks.BMC medical ethics · 2026Pooled it
- Reconsidering dependence on life-sustaining treatment as a criterion for assisted suicide: the Italian legal unicum in comparative perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- End-of-life in the operational functioning of public healthcare: ethical and legal issues.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2023Article
- Euthanasia and assisted suicide: An in-depth review of relevant historical aspects.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Review
- Palliative Sedation-The Last Resort in Case of Difficult Symptom Control: A Narrative Review and Experiences from Palliative Care in Switzerland.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- [Highlights of the 55th SEPAR Congress].Open respiratory archivesReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the Spanish law on euthanasia and assisted suicide with those that exist in other countries.
designSystematic review of the bibliography. DATA SOURCES: Medline/PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies that contained in their title or abstract the descriptors «euthanasia» or «assisted suicide» and also «legislation» or «law», between 2002 and the end of 2020. STUDY SELECTION: The search found 1647 studies and after screening 663 were assessed, of which 30 were included in the review. Studies that only contained opinions or did not provide data on euthanasia/assisted suicide in the countries that have them regulated were rejected. DATA EXTRACTION: We registered the criteria that regulate the acceptance or rejection of a request for euthanasia or assisted suicide in Spain and in the other countries where they are decriminalized.
resultsThe euthanasia regulations in the world can be grouped into three groups: laws that allow euthanasia and assisted suicide (Netherlands, Belgium, some states of Australia, New Zealand, Spain), those in which the law only allows assisted suicide (USA) and those in which only assisted suicide is admitted and based on court decisions, without specific legislation (Switzerland, Germany).
conclusionsAlthough there are differences, the laws that the Spanish euthanasia law most closely resembles are those of the Netherlands and Belgium, so it is foreseeable that the casuistry of euthanasia and its figures in Spain will resemble that of those countries in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.