Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34797889›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Risk factors and spatio-temporal patterns of livestock anthrax in Khuvsgul Province, Mongolia.

Tuvshinzaya Zorigt, Satoshi Ito, Norikazu Isoda, Yoshikazu Furuta, Misheck Shawa, Natsagdorj Norov, Baasansuren Lkham, Jargalsaikhan Enkhtuya, Hideaki Higashi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Anthropogenic impacts at the interface of animal spatial and social behaviour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tuvshinzaya ZorigtDivision of Infection and Immunity, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Satoshi ItoUnit of Risk Analysis and Management, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Norikazu IsodaLaboratory of Microbiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3480-988X
Yoshikazu FurutaDivision of Infection and Immunity, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Misheck ShawaDivision of Infection and Immunity, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Natsagdorj NorovDivision of Quality Management and Coordination, Mongolian University of Life Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Baasansuren LkhamLaboratory of Infectious Disease and Immunology, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Mongolian University of Life Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Jargalsaikhan EnkhtuyaLaboratory of Food Safety and Hygiene, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Mongolian University of Life Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Hideaki HigashiDivision of Infection and Immunity, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5370-7865
Hokkaido University · JPMongolian University of Life Sciences · MN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthrax is a worldwide zoonotic disease. Anthrax has long been a public health and socio-economic issue in Mongolia. Presently, there is no spatial information on carcass burial sites as a potential hazard of future anthrax outbreaks and possible risk factors associated with anthrax occurrences in Mongolia. Here, we analyze retrospective data (1986-2015) on the disposal sites of livestock carcasses to describe historical spatio-temporal patterns of livestock anthrax in Khuvsgul Province, which showed the highest anthrax incidence rate in Mongolia. From the results of spatial mean and standard deviational ellipse analyses, we found that the anthrax spatial distribution in livestock did not change over the study period, indicating a localized source of exposure. The multi-distance spatial cluster analysis showed that carcass sites distributed in the study area are clustered. Using kernel density estimation analysis on carcass sites, we identified two anthrax hotspots in low-lying areas around the south and north regions. Notably, this study disclosed a new hotspot in the northern part that emerged in the last decade of the 30-year study period. The highest proportion of cases was recorded in cattle, whose prevalence per area was highest in six districts (i.e., Murun, Chandmani-Undur, Khatgal, Ikh-Uul, Tosontsengel, and Tsagaan-Uul), suggesting that vaccination should prioritize cattle in these districts. Furthermore, size of outbreaks was influenced by the annual summer mean air temperature of Khuvsgul Province, probably by affecting the permafrost freeze-thawing activity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthraxCattleDisease OutbreaksLivestockMongoliaPermafrostPublic HealthRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSeasonsSpatial AnalysisTemperatureVaccinationZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID34797889
PMCPMC8604359
OpenAlexW3212503462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.