Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34797835›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

The association between self-reported stress and cardiovascular measures in daily life: A systematic review.

Thomas Vaessen, Aki Rintala, Natalya Otsabryk, Wolfgang Viechtbauer, Martien Wampers, Stephan Claes, Inez Myin-Germeys

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Do psychological flexibility and interparental mutually responsive orientation reduce postpartum parenting stress and coparenting difficulties?Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2025
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Thomas VaessenCenter for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Aki RintalaCenter for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0066-4697
Natalya OtsabrykCenter for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Wolfgang ViechtbauerCenter for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Martien WampersCenter for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Stephan ClaesCenter for Mind-Body Research, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Inez Myin-GermeysCenter for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BELAB University of Applied Sciences · FIMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStress plays an important role in the development of mental illness, and an increasing number of studies is trying to detect moments of perceived stress in everyday life based on physiological data gathered using ambulatory devices. However, based on laboratory studies, there is only modest evidence for a relationship between self-reported stress and physiological ambulatory measures. This descriptive systematic review evaluates the evidence for studies investigating an association between self-reported stress and physiological measures under daily life conditions.

methodsThree databases were searched for articles assessing an association between self-reported stress and cardiovascular and skin conductance measures simultaneously over the course of at least a day.

resultsWe reviewed findings of 36 studies investigating an association between self-reported stress and cardiovascular measures with overall 135 analyses of associations between self-reported stress and cardiovascular measures. Overall, 35% of all analyses showed a significant or marginally significant association in the expected direction. The most consistent results were found for perceived stress, high-arousal negative affect scales, and event-related self-reported stress measures, and for frequency-domain heart rate variability physiological measures. There was much heterogeneity in measures and methods.

conclusionThese findings confirm that daily-life stress-dynamics are complex and require a better understanding. Choices in design and measurement seem to play a role. We provide some guidance for future studies.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesData ManagementHumansMental DisordersStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID34797835
PMCPMC8604333
OpenAlexW3213655796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.