ArticleJournal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)2022
Discriminating head trauma outcomes using machine learning and genomics.
Article in Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A percentage of the population suffers prolonged and persistent post-concussion symptoms (PCS) following average head injuries or develops severe neurological dysfunction following minor head trauma. Genetic variants that may contribute to individual response to head trauma have been investigated in some studies, but to date none have explored the use of machine learning (ML) methods with genomic data to specifically explore outcomes of head trauma. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was completed for three groups of individuals (N = 60): (a) 16 individuals with severe neurological responses to minor head trauma, (b) 26 individuals with persistent PCS and (c) 18 individuals with normal recovery from concussion or mTBI. Gradient boosted tree algorithms were applied to the data using XGBoost. By using variants with CADD scores above 15 in the training set (randomly sampled 70%), we identified signatures that accurately distinguish to accurately distinguish the test groups with an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8 (SE = 0.019). Metrics including positive and negative prediction values, as well as kappa were all within acceptable range to support the prediction accuracy. This study illustrates how ML methods in combination with WES data have the potential to predict severe or prolonged responses to head trauma from healthy recovery. KEY MESSAGES: Linear association analysis has been inconclusive in concussion genetics. Non-linear methods as boosted trees can offer better insights in small samples. Strong discrimination trends can be achieved from exome data of cases and controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.