Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34797189›Full record

ArticleNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2022

The Emergence of Stereotyped Kinematic Synergies when Mice Reach to Grasp Following Stroke.

Gustavo Balbinot, Sebastien Denize, Diane C Lagace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Refined movement analysis in the staircase test reveals differential motor deficits in mouse models of stroke.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gustavo BalbinotKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, 7989University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sebastien DenizeDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Neuroscience Program, Brain and Mind Research Institute, Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery, 6363University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Diane C LagaceDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Neuroscience Program, Brain and Mind Research Institute, Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery, 6363University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9267-793X

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reaching tasks are commonly used in preclinical and clinical studies to assess the acquisition of fine motor skills and recovery of function following stroke. These tasks are often used to assess functional deficits in the absence of quantifying the quality of movement which requires kinematic analysis. To meet this need, this study uses a kinematic analysis in mice performing the Montoya staircase task at 5 and 14 days following a cortical photothrombosis-induced stroke. Following stroke, the mice had reaching impairments associated with sustained deficits including longer, unsmooth, and less individuated paw trajectories. Two weeks after stroke we also detected the emergence of abnormal elbow and shoulder angles, flexion/extensions, and stereotyped kinematic synergies. These data suggest that proximal and distal segments acting in concert is paramount during post-stroke reaching and encourage further analysis of synergies within the translational pipeline of preclinical to clinical studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalBiomechanical PhenomenaDisease Models, AnimalExtremitiesMiceMotor ActivityPsychomotor PerformanceStereotyped BehaviorStrokecompensationkinematicsmicereachstrokesynergy

Identifiers

PMID34797189
PMCPMC8721532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.