Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34796460›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2022

The practice of regional anesthesia during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international survey of members of three regional anesthesia societies.

Vishal Uppal, Harsha Shanthanna, Hari Kalagara, Rakesh V Sondekoppam, Sameh M Hakim, Meg A Rosenblatt, Amit Pawa, Alan J R Macfarlane, Eleni Moka, Samer Narouze

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Association between anesthesia technique and death after hip fracture repair for patients with COVID-19.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Vishal UppalDepartment of Anesthesia, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, Nova Scotia Health Authority and IWK Health Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3K 6R8, Canada. v.uppal@dal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7263-2072
Harsha ShanthannaDepartment of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Hari KalagaraDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Rakesh V SondekoppamDepartment of Anesthesia, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Sameh M HakimDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Meg A RosenblattDepartment of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai Morningside and West Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Amit PawaDepartment of Anaesthesia, Guys' and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Alan J R MacfarlaneDepartment of Anaesthesia, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Eleni MokaAnaesthesiology Department, Creta Interclinic Hospital - Hellenic Healthcare Group (HHG), Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Samer NarouzeNortheast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, USA.
Ain Shams University · EGDalhousie University · CAGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBMayo Clinic in Florida · USMcMaster University · CAMount Sinai Hospital · USPolyclinic General Hospital · GRUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Iowa · USWestern Reserve Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the preferences and attitudes of members of regional anesthesia societies during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsWe distributed an electronic survey to members of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Regional Anaesthesia-UK, and the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia & Pain Therapy. A questionnaire consisting of 19 questions was developed by a panel of experienced regional anesthesiologists and distributed by email to the participants. The survey covered the following domains: participant information, practice settings, preference for the type of anesthetic technique, the use of personal protective equipment, and oxygen therapy.

resultsThe survey was completed by 729 participants from 73 different countries, with a response rate of 20.1% (729/3,630) for the number of emails opened and 8.5% (729/8,572) for the number of emails sent. Most respondents (87.7%) identified as anesthesia staff (faculty or consultant) and practiced obstetric and non-obstetric anesthesia (55.3%). The practice of regional anesthesia either expanded or remained the same, with only 2% of respondents decreasing their use compared with the pre-pandemic period. The top reasons for an increase in the use of regional anesthesia was to reduce the need for an aerosol-generating medical procedure and to reduce the risk of possible complications to patients. The most common reason for decreased use of regional anesthesia was the risk of urgent conversion to general anesthesia. Approximately 70% of the responders used airborne precautions when providing care to a patient under regional anesthesia. The most common oxygen delivery method was nasal prongs (cannula) with a surgical mask layered over it (61%).

conclusionsGiven the perceived benefits of regional over general anesthesia, approximately half of the members of three regional anesthesia societies seem to have expanded their use of regional anesthesia techniques during the initial surge of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, ConductionCOVID-19HumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesanesthesiaCOVID-19nerve blockregional anesthesiaSARS-CoV-2surveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34796460
PMCPMC8601752
OpenAlexW3211875581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.