Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34796380›Full record

ReviewHandbook of experimental pharmacology2022

Immunosuppression in Lung Transplantation.

Joelle Nelson, Elisabeth Kincaide, Jamie Schulte, Reed Hall, Deborah Jo Levine

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Handbook of experimental pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Efficacy of Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Eliminating De Novo Donor-Specific Antibodies After Lung Transplantation: Importance of Early Intervention.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joelle NelsonDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmacy Services, University Health, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Elisabeth KincaideDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmacy Services, University Health, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Jamie SchulteDepartment of Pharmacy Services, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Reed HallDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmacy Services, University Health, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Deborah Jo LevineDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. levinedj@uthscsa.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunosuppression in lung transplantation is an area devoid of robust clinical data. This chapter will review the history of immunosuppression in lung transplantation. Additionally, it will evaluate the three classes of induction, maintenance, and rescue immunosuppression in detail. Induction immunosuppression in lung transplantation aims to decrease incidence of lung allograft rejection, however infectious risk must be considered when determining if induction is appropriate and which agent is most favorable. Similar to other solid organ transplant patient populations, a multi-drug approach is commonly prescribed for maintenance immunosuppression to minimize single agent drug toxicities. Emphasis of this review is placed on key medication considerations including dosing, adverse effects, and drug interactions. Clinical considerations will be reviewed per drug class given available literature. Finally, acute cellular, antibody mediated, and chronic rejection are reviewed.

Indexed as

Graft RejectionLung TransplantationAntibodiesHumansImmunosuppression TherapyImmunosuppressive AgentsAntibodiesImmunosuppressive AgentsCLADImmunosuppressionLung transplant

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.