Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34796283›Full record

ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2021

At risk child: a contemporary analysis of injured children in London and the South East of England: a prospective, multicentre cohort study.

Ceri Elbourne, Elaine Cole, Stephen Marsh, Dean Rex, Erica Makin, Rebecca Salter, Karim Brohi, Naomi Edmonds, Stewart Cleeve, Breda O'Neill and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Unintentional Injuries Are Associated with Self-Reported Child Maltreatment among Swedish Adolescents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ceri ElbournePaediatric Surgery, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7858-2536
Elaine ColeCentre for Trauma Sciences, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University, London, UK.
Stephen MarshPaediatric Surgery, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Dean RexPaediatric Surgery, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Erica MakinPaediatric Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Rebecca SalterEmergency Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Karim BrohiCentre for Trauma Sciences, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University, London, UK.
Naomi EdmondsPaediatric Intensive Care, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Stewart CleevePaediatric Surgery, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Breda O'NeillPaediatric Anaesthesia, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Paediatric Evaluation of the London Trauma System (PELoTS) Collaborators
Queen Mary University of London · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBKing's College Hospital · GBSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Injury is a leading health burden in children yet relatively little is reported about the contemporary risks they face. Current national registry data may under-represent the true burden of injury to children. We aim to analyse contemporary patterns of paediatric trauma and identify current factors putting children at risk of injury. Methods: A 3-month prospective multicentre cohort evaluation of injured children across the London Major Trauma System was performed. All children receiving a trauma team activation; meeting National Institute for Health and Care Excellence CT head criteria; or admitted/transferred out due to trauma were included. Data were collected on demographics, mechanism and location of injury, and body region injured. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and secondary outcome was safeguarding concerns. Results: 659 children were included. Young children were more likely to be injured at home (0-5 years old: 70.8%, n=167 vs adolescents: 15.6%, n=31). Adolescents were more likely to be injured in the street (42.7%, n=85). Head trauma caused over half of injuries in 0-5 years old (51.9%, n=121). Falls were common and increasingly prevalent in younger children, causing 56.6% (n=372) of injuries. In adolescents, penetrating violence caused more than one in five injuries (21.9%, n=50). Most injured children survived (99.8%, n=658), however, one in four (26.1%, n=172) had safeguarding concerns and a quarter of adolescents had police, third sector or external agency involvement (23.2%, n=53). Conclusions: This study describes modern-day paediatric trauma and highlights the variance in injury patterns in young children and adolescents. Importantly, it highlights differences in actual rates of injuries compared with those reported from current national registry data. We must understand real risks facing 21st century children to effectively safeguard future generations. The results provide an opportunity to reassess the current approach to injury prevention, child and adolescent safeguarding, and public health campaigns for child safety.

Indexed as

Craniocerebral TraumaAccidental FallsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLondonProspective StudiesViolenceadolescent healthdata collectionepidemiologymortality

Identifiers

PMID34796283
PMCPMC8573663
OpenAlexW3213003674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.