Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34796236›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes research2021

Chronic-Care-Management Programs for Multimorbid Patients with Diabetes in Europe: A Scoping Review with the Aim to Identify the Best Practice.

Julia Heike Brettel, Ulf Manuwald, Henriette Hornstein, Joachim Kugler, Ulrike Rothe

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julia Heike BrettelTechnische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Medicine "Carl Gustav Carus", IPAS/Health Sciences/Public Health, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6220-7571
Ulf ManuwaldTechnische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Medicine "Carl Gustav Carus", IPAS/Health Sciences/Public Health, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6240-9475
Henriette HornsteinTechnische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Medicine "Carl Gustav Carus", IPAS/Health Sciences/Public Health, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8610-9493
Joachim KuglerTechnische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Medicine "Carl Gustav Carus", IPAS/Health Sciences/Public Health, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Ulrike RotheTechnische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Medicine "Carl Gustav Carus", IPAS/Health Sciences/Public Health, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9779-7260

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis scoping review is aimed at providing a current descriptive overview of care programs based on the chronic care model (CCM) according to E. H. Wagner. The evaluation is carried out within Europe and assesses the methodology and comparability of the studies.

methodsA systematic search in the databases PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE via OVID was conducted. In the beginning, 2309 articles were found and 48 full texts were examined, 19 of which were incorporated. Included were CCM-based programs from Belgium, Cyprus, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, and the Netherlands. All 19 articles were presented descriptively whereof 11 articles were finally evaluated in a checklist by Rothe et al. (2020). In this paper, the studies were tabulated and evaluated conforming to the same criteria.

resultsDue to the complexity of the CCM and the heterogeneity of the studies in terms of setting and implementation, a direct comparison proved difficult. Nevertheless, the review shows that CCM was successfully implemented in various care situations and also can be useful in single practices, which often dominate the primary care sector in many European health systems. The present review was able to provide a comprehensive overview of the current care situation of chronically ill patients with multimorbidities.

conclusionsA unified nomenclature concerning the distinction between disease management programs and CCM-based programs should be aimed for. Similarly, homogeneous quality standards and a Europe-wide evaluation strategy would be necessary to identify best practice models and to provide better care for the steadily growing number of chronically multimorbid patients.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseDiabetes MellitusEuropeHumansMultimorbidityPatient Care ManagementPractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

PMID34796236
PMCPMC8595013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.