Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34796096›Full record

ArticlePediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition2021

Distinctive Features of Hepatic Steatosis in Children: Is It Primary or Secondary to Inborn Errors of Metabolism?

Asuman Nur Karhan, Hayriye Hizarcioglu-Gulsen, Ersin Gumus, Zuhal Akçören, Hülya Demir, İnci Nur Saltik-Temizel, Diclehan Orhan, Hasan Özen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Does Autophagy have a Role in the Pathogenesis of Pediatric Hepatic Steatosis?Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Article
  5. Glycogen storage diseases: An update.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Asuman Nur KarhanDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Mersin University Faculty of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1665-4255
Hayriye Hizarcioglu-GulsenDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1181-7393
Ersin GumusDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2280-9789
Zuhal AkçörenDepartment of Pediatric Pathology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7108-6129
Hülya DemirDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9271-7639
İnci Nur Saltik-TemizelDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5580-5100
Diclehan OrhanDepartment of Pediatric Pathology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3637-5392
Hasan ÖzenDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9063-3893
Hacettepe University · TRMersin Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe incidence of hepatic steatosis among children has been increasing; however, data distinguishing simple steatosis from a more complex disorder are lacking.

methodsThis study identified the etiologies resulting in hepatic steatosis through a retrospective review of pediatric liver biopsies performed in the last 10 years. A total of 158 patients with hepatic steatosis proven by histopathological evaluation were enrolled in the study, and baseline demographic features, anthropometric measurements, physical examination findings, laboratory data, ultrasonographic findings, and liver histopathologies were noted.

resultsThe two most common diagnoses were inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) (52.5%) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/steatohepatitis (NAFLD/NASH) (29.7%). The three most common diseases in the IEM group were glycogen storage disorders, Wilson's disease, and mitochondrial disease. The rates of consanguineous marriage (75.6%; odds ratio [OR], 26.040) and positive family history (26.5%; OR, 8.115) were significantly higher (

conclusionParents with consanguinity and positive family history, together with clinical and biochemical findings, may provide a high index of suspicion for IEM to distinguish primary steatosis from the consequence of a more complex disorder.

Indexed as

Hepatic steatosisMetabolism, Inborn errorsNonalcoholic hepatic steatosisPediatric

Identifiers

PMID34796096
PMCPMC8593365
OpenAlexW3211402588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.