ArticleCureus2021
Evaluation of Food Trucks' Hygiene During Mass Gathering Events.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During any event, food- and waterborne diseases represent a health risk, so food should be kept in a chilled state while being supplied in the trucks before distribution to consumers. The study aimed to evaluate temperature conditions, microbial contamination of food trucks, and their compliance to the basic local and international standards of food safety during a mass gathering event (pilgrimage). Fifty food trucks were evaluated for proper food storing and microbial contamination (load). A food truck inspection checklist was made to check if the trucks followed the standards of food safety and hygiene. The results showed that 90% of the trucks' refrigerators were between 3 and 5°C. The number of total mesophilic and psychrotrophic bacteria in the contact surfaces varied between 1.93-6.16 (mean 4.0433) and 0.08-4.50 (mean 3.3340) log CFU (colony-forming units)/100 cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.