ArticleCureus2021
Association Between Antidiarrheal Drug Prescription and Return Visits Among Adult Patients With Acute Diarrhea.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Racecadotril in the management of diarrhea: an underestimated therapeutic option?Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whether antidiarrheal medications have benefits or demerits when administered to adult patients with diarrhea remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the association between antidiarrheal drug prescription and clinical outcomes in adult patients with acute diarrhea. This retrospective cohort study was conducted by collecting secondary data of patients' health records at St. Luke's International Hospital from April 1, 2004, to March 31, 2016. We included all participants aged 20-59 years who visited the division of general internal medicine or the emergency room in the hospital due to acute diarrheal symptoms. We excluded those who had chronic diarrhea or were immunocompromised (e.g., those with cancer or immunosuppressant usage). Our primary outcome was return visits within two weeks; the secondary outcome was admission to the hospital due to acute diarrhea within two weeks from the first visit. We compared the outcomes between patients with and without antidiarrheal drug prescriptions. During the study period, a total of 10,246 patients were included, of which 204 (2.0%) were prescribed antidiarrheal drugs. The mean age of the patients was 35.0 (standard deviation: 10.7) years, and 4,130 (40.3%) were men. Patients who were prescribed antidiarrheal drugs were more likely to be prescribed antibiotics (p<0.01). The adjusted odds ratios for return visits among patients with and without antidiarrheal drug prescription were 1.24-1.59, which were not significant. We demonstrated that antidiarrheal drug prescription was not associated with return visits or hospital admission among adult patients with acute diarrhea. This finding suggests that antidiarrheal medications have more benefits than risks in adult patients with acute diarrhea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.