Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34796024›Full record

SynthesisSovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine2021

Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Neurosurgery: a Systematic Literature Review Using Topic Modeling. Part II: Research Objectives and Perspectives.

G V Danilov, M A Shifrin, K V Kotik, T A Ishankulov, Yu N Orlov, A S Kulikov, A A Potapov

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Multi-criteria evaluation of clinical decision-making performance in spinal neurosurgery and physical therapy scenarios: A comparative analysis of artificial intelligence models.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

G V DanilovScientific Board Secretary; N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 16, 4 Tverskaya-Yamskaya St., Moscow, 125047, Russia; Head of the Laboratory of Biomedical Informatics and Artificial Intelligence; N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 16, 4 Tverskaya-Yamskaya St., Moscow, 125047, Russia.
M A ShifrinScientific Consultant, Laboratory of Biomedical Informatics and Artificial Intelligence; N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 16, 4 Tverskaya-Yamskaya St., Moscow, 125047, Russia.
K V KotikPhysics Engineer, Laboratory of Biomedical Informatics and Artificial Intelligence; N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 16, 4 Tverskaya-Yamskaya St., Moscow, 125047, Russia.
T A IshankulovEngineer, Laboratory of Biomedical Informatics and Artificial Intelligence; N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 16, 4 Tverskaya-Yamskaya St., Moscow, 125047, Russia.
Yu N OrlovHead of the Department of Computational Physics and Kinetic Equations; Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 4 Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047, Russia.
A S KulikovStaff Anesthesiologist; N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 16, 4 Tverskaya-Yamskaya St., Moscow, 125047, Russia.
A A PotapovProfessor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Chief Scientific Supervisor N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 16, 4 Tverskaya-Yamskaya St., Moscow, 125047, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current increase in the number of publications on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in neurosurgery indicates a new trend in clinical neuroscience.

methodsUsing the PubMed search engine, 327 original journal articles published from 1996 to July 2019 and related to the use of AI technologies in neurosurgery, were selected. The typical issues addressed by using AI were identified for each area of neurosurgery.

resultsThe typical AI applications within each of the five main areas of neurosurgery (neuro-oncology, functional, vascular, spinal neurosurgery, and traumatic brain injury) were defined.

conclusionThe article highlights the main areas and trends in the up-to-date AI research in neurosurgery, which might be helpful in planning new scientific projects.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeurosurgeryNeurosurgical ProceduresPubMedTechnologyartificial intelligencenatural language processingneurosurgerytopic modeling in neurosurgery

Identifiers

PMID34796024
PMCPMC8596229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.