Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34795937›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2021

Is sleeve lobectomy safe after induction therapy?-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Louis-Emmanuel Chriqui, Céline Forster, Alban Lovis, Hasna Bouchaab, Thorsten Krueger, Jean Yannis Perentes, Michel Gonzalez

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Louis-Emmanuel ChriquiService of Thoracic Surgery. University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Céline ForsterService of Thoracic Surgery. University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Alban LovisService of Pneumology. University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Hasna BouchaabService of Oncology University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Thorsten KruegerService of Thoracic Surgery. University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean Yannis PerentesService of Thoracic Surgery. University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Michel GonzalezService of Thoracic Surgery. University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSleeve lobectomy (SL) is a lung-sparing procedure, which is accepted as a valid operation for centrally-located advanced tumors. These tumors often require induction treatment by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy to downstage the disease and thus facilitate subsequent surgery. However, induction therapy may potentially increase the risk of bronchial anastomotic complications and related morbidity. This meta-analysis aims to determine the impact of induction therapy on the outcomes of pulmonary SL.

methodsWe compared studies of patients undergoing SL or bilobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with and without induction therapy. Outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality, morbidity, anastomosis complication and 5-year survival. Odds ratio (OR) were computed following the Mantel-Haenszel method.

resultsTen studies were included for a total of 1,204 patients. There was no statistical difference for between patients who underwent induction therapy followed by surgery and patients who underwent surgery alone in term of post-operative mortality (OR: 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76-4.25, P value =0.19) and morbidity (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.90-1.52, P value =0.237). Anastomosis related complications rate were 5.2% and appears increased after induction therapy with a statistical difference close to the significance (OR: 1.65, 95% CI: 0.97-2.83, P value =0.06). Patients undergoing surgery alone showed better survival at 5 years (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.15-2.00, P value =0.003).

conclusionsSL following induction therapy can be safely performed with no increase of mortality and morbidity. However, the need for induction therapy before surgery is associated with increased anastomotic complications and poorer survival prognosis at 5 years.

Indexed as

anastomosis complicationinduction therapySleeve lobectomy (SL)survivalthoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID34795937
PMCPMC8575812
OpenAlexW3201079785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.