Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34795920›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2021

Clinical characteristics of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessed using GOLD 2016 and GOLD 2018 classifications: a cross-sectional study in China.

Wenhua Jian, Huiqing Zeng, Xiaoju Zhang, Chunmei Yun, Zuojun Xu, Yan Chen, Guochao Shi, Yingyu Wang, Yun Li, Jinping Zheng

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Wenhua JianState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Centre for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Huiqing ZengDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Xiaoju ZhangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Chunmei YunDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Hohhot, China.
Zuojun XuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yan ChenDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Guochao ShiDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Rui Jin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yingyu WangGlaxoSmithKline, Shanghai, China.
Yun LiGlaxoSmithKline, Shanghai, China.
Jinping ZhengState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Centre for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
GlaxoSmithKline (China) · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CNHenan Provincial People's Hospital · CNInner Mongolia People's Hospital · CNSecond Xiangya Hospital of Central South University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease · CNZhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2017, the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) removed spirometry as a criterion for classifying GOLD risk groups (A-D, low-high risk).

methodsIn this cross-sectional observational study in China, we used the GOLD 2016 (spirometry included) and 2018 (spirometry eliminated) criteria for classifying GOLD risk groups to describe: the proportion of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in each GOLD risk group; disease severity; demographics and comorbidities. Patients aged ≥40 years with a clinical COPD diagnosis for ≥1 year were included. During a single study visit, patients completed the COPD assessment test, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale assessment, and spirometry tests. Demographics, medical history, and treatment data were recorded.

resultsIn total, 838 patients were included. Most patients were male (86.4%), ≥65 years old (58.6%), and current or former smokers (78.5%). By GOLD 2016, the highest proportion of patients were Group D (42.8%), followed by B (28.2%). By GOLD 2018, the highest proportion of patients were Group B (57.3%), followed by A (25.5%). A total of 296 patients (35.3%) were reclassified, either from Group C to Group A or from Group D to Group B. Overall, 36.2% of patients were receiving treatment concordant with GOLD 2016 recommendations; 34.1% were not receiving any inhaled medication.

conclusionsThe distribution of COPD severity shifted from a high-risk category (by GOLD 2016) to a low-risk category (by GOLD 2018). The high proportion of patients not receiving maintenance medication reflects a high level of under-treatment of the disease.

Indexed as

Chinachronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)cross-sectional observational studydyspnea-scale assessmentGlobal Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) classification

Identifiers

PMID34795920
PMCPMC8575805
OpenAlexW3204675647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.