ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2021
Diagnostic performance of digital tomosynthesis to evaluate silicone airway stents and related complications.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of stationary digital chest tomosynthesis to portable chest radiographs: A patient study.PloS one · 2026Article
- In Vitro Evaluation of Zinc Oxide Tetrapods as a New Material Component for Glaucoma Implants.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDigital tomosynthesis (DTS) is an imaging technique with benefits in reconstructing sequential cross-sectional images. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of DTS for silicone airway stents and stent-related complications in patients who underwent bronchoscopic intervention.
methodsThis retrospective study included patients who underwent bronchoscopic intervention after chest radiography (CXR) and DTS examinations from September 2013 to August 2020. The interval between CXR, DTS, and bronchoscopic intervention was a maximum of 10 days. CXR and DTS images were evaluated using a bronchoscopic view as a reference. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for assessing the diagnostic performance.
resultsThe total CXR, DTS, and bronchoscopic intervention-matching datasets comprised 213 cases from 119 patients and, silicone stents were present in 167 of them. The ability of DTS to detect silicone stents was better than that of CXR (sensitivity, 92.8%
conclusionsDTS was more sensitive and accurate in revealing silicone airway stents and silicone stent-related complications than CXR. However, there were limitations in confirming stent migration and obstruction with DTS due to granulation tissue growth and fibrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.