Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34795734›Full record

ArticleAfrican health sciences2021

Level of utilization and provider-related barriers to the use of hydroxyurea in the treatment of sickle cell disease patients in Jos, North-Central Nigeria.

Akinyemi Od Ofakunrin, Edache S Okpe, Tolulope O Afolaranmi, Rasaq R Olaosebikan, Patience U Kanhu, Kehinde Adekola, Nantok Dami, Atiene S Sagay

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African health sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akinyemi Od OfakunrinDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Jos / Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Nigeria.
Edache S OkpeDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Jos / Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Nigeria.
Tolulope O AfolaranmiDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Jos / Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Nigeria.
Rasaq R OlaosebikanDepartment of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia Pennsylvania, USA.
Patience U KanhuDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Jos / Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Nigeria.
Kehinde AdekolaDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, USA.
Nantok DamiDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Jos / Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Nigeria.
Atiene S SagayDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Jos / Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Nigeria.
Jos University Teaching Hospital · NG

Funding

Sickle Pan African Research Consortium NigEria (SPARC-NEt)U01HL156942 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ABUJA · PI NNODU, OBIAGELI EUNICE · 2021 to 2025
$1.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL156942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHydroxyurea is underutilized by sickle cell health-care providers in Nigeria despite available evidence of its effectiveness in reducing the manifestations and complications of sickle cell disease (SCD).

objectivesTo assess the level of utilization and provider-related barriers to the use of hydroxyurea in SCD therapy in Jos, Nigeria.

methodsA cross-sectional study conducted among 132 medical doctors providing care for SCD patients. Data on sociodemographics, utilization and barriers to hydroxyurea use were obtained. The barriers were fed cumulatively into the logistic regression model as predictors of utilization.

resultsOf the 132 care providers, 88 (67%) had been in medical practice for ≥6years. The level of utilization of hydroxyurea was 24.2%. The significant barriers that predicted the non-utilization of hydroxyurea included lack of expertise (OR=5.1; 95% CI=2.65-9.05), lack of clinical guidelines (OR=3.84; 95% CI=2.37-14.33), fear of side-effects (OR=0.50; 95% CI=0.22-0.68) and doubt about its effectiveness (OR=0.30; 95% CI=0.20-0.90).

conclusionThe level of utilization of hydroxyurea in the treatment of SCD among the care providers is sub-optimal with the lack of expertise in its use identified as the most prominent barrier. There is an urgent need for the training of sickle cell care-providers and the development of clinical guidelines on hydroxyurea use.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellAntisickling AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansHydroxyureaMaleNigeriaPractice Patterns, Physicians'Antisickling AgentsHydroxyureabarriers to hydroxyureaHydroxyurea utilizationNigeriasickle cell disease

Identifiers

PMID34795734
PMCPMC8568227
OpenAlexW3189872284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.