Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34795646›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021

Quantitative Examination of Five Stochastic Cell-Cycle and Cell-Size Control Models for

Guillaume Le Treut, Fangwei Si, Dongyang Li, Suckjoon Jun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Simulation-based inference captures non-Markovian effects as exemplified in protein production kinetics through cell division.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Nonlinear memory in cell-division dynamics across species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evolutionary Advantage of Cell Size Control.Physical review letters · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Dispensability of extrinsic DnaA regulators inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Recollections of a Helmstetter Disciple.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  15. Using conditional independence tests to elucidate causal links in cell cycle regulation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Guillaume Le TreutTheory Group, Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Fangwei SiDepartment of Physics, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Dongyang LiDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, Broad Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States.
Suckjoon JunDepartment of Physics, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
University of California, San Diego · USChan Zuckerberg Initiative (United States) · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examine five quantitative models of the cell-cycle and cell-size control in

Indexed as

adderbacterial cell cyclebacterial cell size controlbacterial physiologyquantitative microbial physiology

Identifiers

PMID34795646
PMCPMC8594374
OpenAlexW3211264696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.