Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34795538›Full record

ReviewOpen access emergency medicine : OAEM2021

D-Dimer Tests in the Emergency Department: Current Insights.

Francesca Innocenti, Cristian Lazzari, Francesca Ricci, Elisa Paolucci, Ilya Agishev, Riccardo Pini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open access emergency medicine : OAEM, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Important Role of Preoperative D-Dimer in Constrictive Pericarditis.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesca InnocentiEmergency Department High-Dependency Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7805-7619
Cristian LazzariEmergency Department High-Dependency Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Francesca RicciEmergency Department High-Dependency Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Elisa PaolucciEmergency Department High-Dependency Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Ilya AgishevEmergency Department High-Dependency Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Riccardo PiniEmergency Department High-Dependency Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Emergency Medicine setting, D-dimer is currently employed in the diagnostic assessment of suspected venous thromboembolism and aortic syndrome. The nonspecific symptoms reported by patients, like chest pain, dyspnea or syncope, uncover a wide range of differential diagnosis, spanning from mild to life-threatening conditions. Therefore, we assumed the perspective of the Emergency Physician and, in this narrative review, we reported a brief presentation of the epidemiology of these symptoms and the characteristics of patients, in whom we could suspect the aforementioned pathologies. We also reported in which patients D-dimer gives useful information. In fact, when the probability of the disease is high, the D-dimer level is futile. On the contrary, given the low specificity of the test, when the probability of the disease is very low, a false-positive value of the D-dimer only increases the risk of overtesting. Patients with low to moderate probability really benefit from the D-dimer testing, in order to prevent the execution of expensive and potentially dangerous imaging tests. In the second part of the review, we focused on the prognostic value of the test in septic patients. The early prognostic stratification of septic patients remains a challenge for the Emergency Physician, in the absence of a definite biomarker or score to rely on. Therefore, we need several parameters for the early identification of patients at risk of an adverse prognosis and the D-dimer may play a role in this demanding task. SARS COVID-19 patients represent an emerging reality, where the role of the D-dimer for prognostic stratification could be relevant. In fact, in patients with severe forms of this disease, the D-dimer reaches very high values, which appear to parallel the course of respiratory failure. Whether the test may add useful information for the management of these patients remains to be determined.

Indexed as

aortic syndromesCOVID-19diagnostic assessmentprognostic stratificationsepsisvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID34795538
PMCPMC8593515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.