ArticleCancer management and research2021
The Impasse on Overall Survival in Oncology Reimbursement Decision-Making: How Can We Resolve This?
Article in Cancer management and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Trial
- Real-world progression-free survival 2 (PFS2) and tumor response of CDK4/6 inhibitors plus an aromatase inhibitor in patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer in US routine clinical practice.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Observational
- Developing and evaluating definitions of real-world clinical endpoints for patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer using a United States of America secondary database.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- Challenges in Conducting Quantitative Patient-Centered Benefit-Risk Assessments: A Case Study in Ph + ALL with Immature Efficacy Data.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Article
- Article
- Addressing clinical uncertainties in ATMP reimbursement: a review of methodological guidelines and European practice.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Enhancing confidence in complex health technology assessments by using real-world evidence: highlighting existing strategies for effective drug evaluation.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Review
- Elevated VAMP8 expression promotes cervical cancer progression by enhancing autophagy via HIF-1 pathway.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: 19th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Consensus Discussed against the Background of German Treatment Recommendations.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2025Article
- Article
- The evolving value assessment of cancer therapies: Results from a modified Delphi study.Health policy OPEN · 2024Article
- Calculating the Expected Net Benefit of Sampling for Survival Data: A Tutorial and Case Study.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024Article
- Cancer Drugs Reimbursed with Limited Evidence on Overall Survival and Quality of Life: Do Follow-Up Studies Confirm Patient Benefits?Clinical drug investigation · 2023Review
- An Investigation into the Relationship Between Choice of Model Structure and How to Adjust for Subsequent Therapies Using a Case Study in Oncology.Applied health economics and health policy · 2023Article
- Patient preferences do matter: a discrete choice experiment conducted with breast cancer patients in six European countries, with latent class analysis.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2023Article
- Considerations for the Utility of Real-World Evidence Beyond Trial Data in Advanced NSCLC: The Case of Frontline Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.Cancer management and research · 2022Article
- Correlation between clinical trial endpoints of marketed cancer drugs and reimbursement decisions in China.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Patient Preferences in Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2+ Early-Stage Breast Cancer.MDM policy & practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mature overall survival (OS) data are often unavailable at the time of regulatory and reimbursement decisions for a new cancer treatment. For patients with early-stage cancers treated with potentially curative treatments, demonstrating an OS benefit may take years and may be confounded by subsequent lines of therapy or crossover to the investigational treatment. For patients with advanced-stage cancers, mature OS data may be available but difficult to interpret for similar reasons. There are strong opinions about approval and reimbursement in the absence of mature OS data, with concerns over delay in patient access set against concerns about uncertainty in long-term benefit. This position paper reflects our individual views as patient advocate, clinician or health economist on one aspect of this debate. We look at payer decisions in the absence of mature OS data, considering when and how non-OS trial outcomes could inform decision-making and how uncertainty can be addressed beyond the trial, supporting these views with evidence from the literature. We consider when it is reasonable for payers to expect or not expect mature OS data at the initial reimbursement decision (based on criteria such as cancer stage and treatment efficacy) acknowledging that there are settings in which mature OS data are expected. We propose flexible strategies for generating and appraising patient-relevant evidence, including context-relevant endpoints and quality of life measures, when survival rates are good and mature OS data are not expected. We note that fair reimbursement is important; this means valuing patient benefit as shown through prespecified endpoints and reappraising if there is ongoing uncertainty or failure to show a sustained benefit. We suggest that reimbursement systems continue to evolve to align with scientific advances, because innovation is only meaningful if readily accessible to patients. The proposed strategies have the potential to promote thorough assessment of potential benefit to patients and lead to timely access to effective medicines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.