Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34795475›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2021

Contrast Sensitivity Changes in Center Involving Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Aflibercept.

Donald R Nixon, Nicholas Flinn, Claudia Enderlein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Associations of quantitative contrast sensitivity with wide-field swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography in retinal vein occlusion.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Structure-function associations between contrast sensitivity and widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic macular edema.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Donald R NixonDepartment of Surgery Northern Ontario School of Medicine Nosm, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 2C6, Canada.
Nicholas FlinnTrimed Eye Centre Barrie Ontario, Barrie, Ontario, L4M 4S5, Canada.
Claudia EnderleinTrillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, L5B 1B8, Canada.
Barrie Urology Group · CANOSM University · CATrillium Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo characterize the changes in contrast sensitivity (CS) and retinal anatomy in patients with center involving diabetic macular edema (CDME) measured from baseline to post-loading doses of aflibercept. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis single center, prospective, open-label, non-controlled evaluation of five aflibercept intravitreal injections for treatment of CDME over a 16-week period. One eye in each of the forty patients will receive aflibercept every 4 weeks. Subject testing includes measurements of central retinal thickness (CRT), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Pelli-Robson (PR) CS, and CamBlobs (CB) CS at 20 weeks post baseline.

resultsA total of 40 eyes from 40 patients with CDME were analyzed. The mean age was 62.9 ±10.6 years and 55% were male. At baseline, CRT was 365 ±94.6µm with logMAR BCVA 0.25±0.20. CS PR at baseline was 1.46±0.13 logCS compared to the normal population 1.79±0.10 logCS (P=<0.01), and the CS CB was 1.55±0.16 logCS compared to 1.92±0.08 logCS in the normal population (P=<0.01). At the completion of the study, CRT was decreased to 289 ±43.7µm (P=<0.001), and the logMAR BCVA improved to 0.18±0.02 (P=<0.05). At the same point the CS PR was 1.52±0.16 and CS CB was 1.62±0.16 logCS. At the end of the study 85% of eyes obtained BCVA of 0.3 logMAR or better. There was a reduction from baseline of 82.5% to 57.5% in the number of patients that had a CS that was two standard deviations below the mean. The greatest improvement in CS was associated with those patients that had the greatest reduction in CRT.

conclusionCS impairment in patients with CDME is significant. Although treatment can be associated with improvement, there still remains a group with decreased CS that could impact activities of daily living. Earlier intervention using reduction in CS as a metric may be associated with reduced residual deficit associated with treatment.

Indexed as

contrast sensitivityfunctional impairmentresidual deficit

Identifiers

PMID34795475
PMCPMC8593693
OpenAlexW3212561994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.