Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34795255›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Machine learning of genomic features in organotropic metastases stratifies progression risk of primary tumors.

Biaobin Jiang, Quanhua Mu, Fufang Qiu, Xuefeng Li, Weiqi Xu, Jun Yu, Weilun Fu, Yong Cao, Jiguang Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Deciphering organotropism reveals therapeutic targets in metastasis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Cusp bifurcation in a metastatic regulatory network.Journal of theoretical biology · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Biaobin JiangDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9995-4925
Quanhua MuDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Fufang QiuDivision of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Xuefeng LiThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Qingyuan People's Hospital, 511518, Qingyuan, China.
Weiqi XuDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 200032, Shanghai, China.
Jun YuInstitute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3435-6550
Weilun FuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100070, Beijing, China.
Yong CaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100070, Beijing, China.
Jiguang WangDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China. jgwang@ust.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6923-4097
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology · HKCapital Medical University · CNChinese University of Hong Kong · HKShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CNThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic cancer is associated with poor patient prognosis but its spatiotemporal behavior remains unpredictable at early stage. Here we develop MetaNet, a computational framework that integrates clinical and sequencing data from 32,176 primary and metastatic cancer cases, to assess metastatic risks of primary tumors. MetaNet achieves high accuracy in distinguishing the metastasis from the primary in breast and prostate cancers. From the prediction, we identify Metastasis-Featuring Primary (MFP) tumors, a subset of primary tumors with genomic features enriched in metastasis and demonstrate their higher metastatic risk and shorter disease-free survival. In addition, we identify genomic alterations associated with organ-specific metastases and employ them to stratify patients into various risk groups with propensities toward different metastatic organs. This organotropic stratification method achieves better prognostic value than the standard histological grading system in prostate cancer, especially in the identification of Bone-MFP and Liver-MFP subtypes, with potential in informing organ-specific examinations in follow-ups.

Indexed as

Machine LearningBiomarkers, TumorComputational BiologyDisease ProgressionGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMutationNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsOrgan SpecificityPrognosisRisk FactorsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID34795255
PMCPMC8602327
OpenAlexW3120239343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.