ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2021
A Machine learning model trained on dual-energy CT radiomics significantly improves immunotherapy response prediction for patients with stage IV melanoma.
Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning in the prediction of immunotherapy response and prognosis of melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- CT radiomics showed no improvement beyond volume dynamics for early lesion-level size response to immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Observational
- Radiomics for risk stratification in brain metastases: potential in melanoma brain metastases.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2026Article
- Review
- A new era of precision diagnosis and treatment for lung cancer: artificial intelligence-driven multimodal data integration and clinical applications.Cell death & disease · 2026Review
- CT-based radiomics for predicting the treatment response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in unresectable gastric cancer.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Construction of a postoperative disease-free survival prediction model for non-small cell lung cancer patients based on dual-energy computed tomography parameters and blood inflammatory indicators.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Radiomics analysis of dual-energy CT-derived iodine maps for predicting histopathologic grading of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a two-center study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Metastatic Melanoma Prognosis Prediction Using a TC Radiomic-Based Machine Learning Model: A Preliminary Study.Cancers · 2025Article
- Radiomic analysis of patient and interorgan heterogeneity in response to immunotherapies and BRAF-targeted therapy in metastatic melanoma.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Article
- Convergence of evolving artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques in precision oncology.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical-radiomics models with machine-learning algorithms to distinguish uncomplicated from complicated acute appendicitis in adults: a multiphase multicenter cohort study.Gastroenterology report · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Post-Operative Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Following Pediatric Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Deep learning on CT scans to predict checkpoint inhibitor treatment outcomes in advanced melanoma.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- What to Expect (and What Not) from Dual-Energy CT Imaging Now and in the Future?Journal of imaging · 2024Review
- Immunotherapy and Cancer: The Multi-Omics Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Tumor therapeutics in the era of "RECIST": past, current insights, and future prospects.Oncology reviews · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics: Clinical Applications for Patients with Advanced Melanoma Treated with Immunotherapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: The path to the real-world clinic.Cell reports. Medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo assess the additive value of dual-energy CT (DECT) over single-energy CT (SECT) to radiomics-based response prediction in patients with metastatic melanoma preceding immunotherapy. MATERIAL AND
methodsA total of 140 consecutive patients with melanoma (58 female, 63±16 years) for whom baseline DECT tumor load assessment revealed stage IV and who were subsequently treated with immunotherapy were included. Best response was determined using the clinical reports (81 responders: 27 complete response, 45 partial response, 9 stable disease). Individual lesion response was classified manually analogous to RECIST 1.1 through 1291 follow-up examinations on a total of 776 lesions (6.7±7.2 per patient). The patients were sorted chronologically into a study and a validation cohort (each n=70). The baseline DECT was examined using specialized tumor segmentation prototype software, and radiomic features were analyzed for response predictors. Significant features were selected using univariate statistics with Bonferroni correction and multiple logistic regression. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the best subset was computed (AUROC). For each combination (SECT/DECT and patient response/lesion response), an individual random forest classifier with 10-fold internal cross-validation was trained on the study cohort and tested on the validation cohort to confirm the predictive performance.
resultsWe performed manual RECIST 1.1 response analysis on a total of 6533 lesions. Multivariate statistics selected significant features for patient response in SECT (min. brightness, R²=0.112, padj. ≤0.001) and DECT (textural coarseness, R²=0.121, padj. ≤0.001), as well as lesion response in SECT (mean absolute voxel intensity deviation, R²=0.115, padj. ≤0.001) and DECT (iodine uptake metrics, R²≥0.12, padj. ≤0.001). Applying the machine learning models to the validation cohort confirmed the additive predictive power of DECT (patient response AUROC SECT=0.5, DECT=0.75; lesion response AUROC SECT=0.61, DECT=0.85; p<0.001).
conclusionThe new method of DECT-specific radiomic analysis provides a significant additive value over SECT radiomics approaches for response prediction in patients with metastatic melanoma preceding immunotherapy, especially on a lesion-based level. As mixed tumor response is not uncommon in metastatic melanoma, this lends a powerful tool for clinical decision-making and may potentially be an essential step toward individualized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.