Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34794985›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Using experience-based codesign to coproduce aphasia rehabilitation services: study protocol.

Lisa Anemaat, Victoria J Palmer, David A Copland, Kathryn Mainstone, Kent Druery, Julia Druery, Bruce Aisthorpe, Geoffrey Binge, Penelope Mainstone, Sarah J Wallace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Co-Designing Aphasia Services: Evaluation of Involvement and Processes to Support Inclusion of People With Post Stroke Aphasia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  3. Adapting Experience-Based Co-Design to Disability Research: Co-Producing the CycLink Co-Design Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lisa AnemaatSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia l.anemaat@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-7410-4652
Victoria J PalmerThe ALIVE National Centre for Mental Health Research Translation, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7212-932X
David A CoplandSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2257-4270
Kathryn MainstoneQueensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Kent DrueryQueensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Julia DrueryQueensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Bruce AisthorpeQueensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Geoffrey BingeQueensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Penelope MainstoneQueensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Sarah J WallaceSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0600-9343

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAphasia is an impairment of language that occurs in 30%-40% of stroke survivors. This often chronic condition results in poor outcomes for the individual with aphasia and their family. Long-term aphasia management is limited, with few people receiving sufficient services by 6-12 months postonset. We present a protocol for the development of coproduced aphasia service elements. We will use experience-based codesign (EBCD), an approach that enables service users and providers to collaboratively develop services and care pathways. Drawing on the experiences of people with aphasia, their families and clinicians we will establish priorities for the development of new services and later work together to codesign them. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This research will be coproduced with people with aphasia (n=30-60), their families (n=30-60) and speech pathologists (n=30-60) in Queensland, Australia, using EBCD. A consumer advisory committee will provide oversight and advice throughout the research. In phase 1, we will use semistructured interviews and the nominal group technique to explore experiences and unmet needs in aphasia rehabilitation. Data will be analysed using thematic analysis and the resulting themes will be prioritised in multistakeholder focus groups. Outcomes of phase 1 will inform future research (phase 2) to codesign services. Financial costs and participant experiences of EBCD will be measured. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Human Research Ethics Committee approval for phase 1 has been obtained (HREC/2020/QRBW/61368). Results will be reported in peer-reviewed journal articles, presented at relevant conferences and, following EBCD suggested best practice, fed back to participants and community members at a celebratory event at completion of the project. The inclusion of service users in all stages of research will facilitate an integrated approach to knowledge translation. A summary of research findings will be made available to participating sites.

Indexed as

AphasiaStrokeAllied Health PersonnelChronic DiseaseHumansTranslational Science, Biomedicalqualitative researchquality in health carerehabilitation medicinestrokestroke medicine

Identifiers

PMID34794985
PMCPMC8603293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.