Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34794735›Full record

Observational studyTaiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology2021

Perinatal outcomes of pregnant women having SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Sevcan Arzu Arinkan, Ezgi Ceren Dallı Alper, Gunes Topcu, Murat Muhcu

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Encourage women to receive COVID-19 vaccination before, during and after pregnancy.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2022
    Article
  5. Pregnant women with COVID-19.Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology · 2022
    Article
  6. Perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19.Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sevcan Arzu ArinkanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: arzuarinkan@gmail.com.
Ezgi Ceren Dallı AlperDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gunes TopcuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
Murat MuhcuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAim of this study is to evaluate the prognosis of pregnant women having SARS-CoV-2 infection and investigate whether there was a difference in perinatal outcomes between pregnant women who had SARS-CoV-2 infection and those who did not. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis prospective observational study was conducted with 116 singleton pregnancies. Cases enrolling in the study were divided into two groups. While those in the first group had a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 46) the second group consisted of healthy pregnant women (n = 70).

resultsEmergency Cesarean section was performed on three SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnancies (30, 33 and 34 gestational weeks). Intensive care unit admission was required for all three cases after delivery and two of them died. Among the pregnancies that had an infection in the third trimester, 71.4% (n = 20) of them had delivery in 14 days after diagnosis and 17.4% (n = 8) of their newborns were followed up at newborn intensive care unit. Overall, only one newborn had a positive swab test result for SARS-CoV-2. There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding their delivery week (37.02 ± 5.85 vs 38.5 ± 2.33). Similarly, there was no significant difference between groups, concerning mean age, parity, and birth weight (P = 0.707, P = 0.092, P = 0.334; P < 0.05). Furthermore, the difference between SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnancies that were followed up as inpatient or outpatient with respect to the delivery week and birth weight was not significant (p > 0.05). Also, APGAR 5 scores of hospitalized women (9.3 ± 1.1) were found to be lower than the outpatient group (9.8 ± 0.8) (P = 0.043; p < 0.05).

conclusionNo significant difference was detected between groups in terms of the delivery week, birth weight, and APGAR scores. The inpatient group was found to have lower APGAR 5 scores.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalAbortion, SpontaneousBirth WeightCesarean SectionCOVID-19FemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPandemicsPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPregnancy OutcomePregnant PeoplePremature BirthSARS-CoV-2COVID-19DeliveryPerinatal outcomesPregnancySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34794735
PMCPMC8426291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.