ArticleJournal of aging studies2021
"But at the age of 85? Forget it!": Internalized ageism, a barrier to technology use.
Article in Journal of aging studies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Social connection and disconnection: older adults' life course perspectives on information and communication technologies.The Gerontologist · 2026Article
- Utilisation of electronic health record systems in clinical nursing practice in Ghana: predictors, benefits, and challenges.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Evaluating digital health literacy interventions for adults 45+ years: a scoping review.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- Article
- An exploratory semantic analysis of age-related stereotypes in OpenAI's GPT 4o model.The Gerontologist · 2026Article
- Internet Use, Subjective Age, and Mental Health Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in China: Pressured Versus Voluntary Internet Use.Depression and anxiety · 2026Article
- Profiles of digital disability among Chinese older adults and its association with cognitive function: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Who adapts to whom: technology or older adults? Mechanisms of technology anxiety among older AI users.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Connections, negotiations, and tensions: Talking tech with older adults.Mobile media & communication · 2026Article
- Age-friendly AI: building bridges between technology and geriatric care.Innovation in aging · 2025Article
- Perspectives of Older Adults on Assistive Technology: Qualitative Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Campaigning an educational website on ageism: lessons from a failed attempt.The Gerontologist · 2025Article
- Article
- Factors that influence technophobia in Chinese older patients with ischemic stroke: a cross-sectional survey.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Perceived age discrimination and social isolation mediate the relationship between disasters and loneliness: results from Wave 1 of the Longitudinal Ageing Study of India.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025Article
- Framing Facets of Social Participation: Older Adults' Experiences of "Social Online Meetings".OTJR : occupation, participation and health · 2025Article
- Eleven-Year Trajectories of Internet Usage Time and Depression Scores Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in China: Latent Class Mixed Model Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Case Reports in the Integration of Technology with Cognitive Rehabilitation for Individuals with Memory Concerns and Their Care Partners.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025Article
- The Motivations of Citizens to Attend an eHealth Course in the Public Library: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored how everyday information and communication technology (EICT), such as online banking, e-shopping, or e-mail, are essential for individuals of all ages to maintain activity engagement, health, and well-being. Yet, older adults are often stereotypically portrayed as incapable, technophobic, or unwilling to engage in EICT. This may further contribute to the digital divide, as age stereotypes have the power to act like self-fulfilling prophecies and impede older adults' engagement in complex everyday life tasks. This study aimed to shed light on internalized ageism as manifested in older non-users' narrations about EICT use. It further explored how age stereotypes in the context of EICT are constructed and perpetuated through disempowering and ageist environments. A qualitative approach was applied, performing semi-structured interviews in participants' homes (N = 15). Data were analyzed following the principles of qualitative content analysis, applying both deductive categorization and inductive coding. Internalized ageism appeared to be an omnipresent element in older adults' narrations about EICT non-use. This was reflected in the four subcategories "competence and learning", "relevance and use", "technology design", and "intergenerational contact". Ageism, as manifested in the social environment and the design of technology, seemingly contributed to the internalization of age stereotypes and low EICT engagement. This research calls for inclusive technology designs, ageism-free EICT learning settings, and awareness campaigns about lifelong learning to help close the digital divide and ensure optimal aging experiences for older people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.