ArticleCritical care (London, England)2021
Cardiogenic shock in Taiwan from 2003 to 2017 (CSiT-15 study).
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07266675 (Post-Acute Phase of Cardiogenic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Post-Acute Phase of Cardiogenic Shock (PACS) Registry
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of emergency quality improvement program on the prognosis of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in Taiwan.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A CLINICAL PREDICTION MODEL FOR SHORT-TERM PROGNOSIS IN PATIENTS WITH NON-ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION-RELATED CARDIOGENIC SHOCK.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2025Article
- Beta-Blockers as an Immunologic and Autonomic Manipulator in Critically Ill Patients: A Review of the Recent Literature.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Comparison of the prognosis among in-hospital survivors of cardiogenic shock based on etiology: AMI and Non-AMI.Annals of intensive care · 2024Article
- Prognosis of cardiogenic shock with and without acute myocardial infarction: results from a prospective, monocentric registry.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024Article
- Age-related outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock stratified by etiology.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2023Article
- Prognostic Value of the AST/ALT Ratio versus Bilirubin in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Genome-phenome wide association study of broadly defined headache.Brain communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigated temporal trends in the treatment and mortality of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) in Taiwan in relation to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) accreditation implemented in 2009 and the unavailability of percutaneous ventricular assist devices.
methodsData of patients diagnosed as having CS between January 2003 and December 2017 were collected from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Each case was followed from the date of emergency department arrival or hospital admission for the first incident associated with a CS diagnosis up to a 1-year interval. Measurements included demographics, comorbidities, treatment, mortality, and medical costs. Using an interrupted time-series (ITS) design with multi-level mixed-effects logistic regression model, we assessed the impact of AMI accreditation implementation on the mortality of patients with AMI and CS overall and stratified by the hospital levels.
resultsIn total, 64 049 patients with CS (mean age:70 years; 62% men) were identified. The incidence rate per 10
conclusionsIn Taiwan, the burden of CS has consistently increased due to high patient complexity, advanced therapies, and stable incidence. Mortality declined over time, particularly in patients with AMI-CS, which may be attributable to advancements in AMI therapies and this quality-improving policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.