Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34794398›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2021

Temozolomide sensitivity of malignant glioma cell lines - a systematic review assessing consistencies between in vitro studies.

Michael T C Poon, Morgan Bruce, Joanne E Simpson, Cathal J Hannan, Paul M Brennan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hydrogel Microdroplet Based Glioblastoma Drug Screening Platform.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Targeting Survivin: Now I Become Death, the Destroyer of Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael T C Poon *Cancer Research UK Brain Tumour Centre of Excellence, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. mpoon@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0053-2184
Morgan Bruce *Biological Sciences, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Joanne E SimpsonCancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Cathal J HannanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Manchester, UK.
Paul M BrennanCancer Research UK Brain Tumour Centre of Excellence, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 27589Cancer Research UK C157/A27589Cancer Research UK C52370/A21586
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalignant glioma cell line models are integral to pre-clinical testing of novel potential therapies. Accurate prediction of likely efficacy in the clinic requires that these models are reliable and consistent. We assessed this by examining the reporting of experimental conditions and sensitivity to temozolomide in glioma cells lines.

methodsWe searched Medline and Embase (Jan 1994-Jan 2021) for studies evaluating the effect of temozolomide monotherapy on cell viability of at least one malignant glioma cell line. Key data items included type of cell lines, temozolomide exposure duration in hours (hr), and cell viability measure (IC

resultsWe included 212 studies from 2789 non-duplicate records that reported 248 distinct cell lines. The commonest cell line was U87 (60.4%). Only 10.4% studies used a patient-derived cell line. The proportion of studies not reporting each experimental condition ranged from 8.0-27.4%, including base medium (8.0%), serum supplementation (9.9%) and number of replicates (27.4%). In studies reporting IC

conclusionTemozolomide sensitivity reported in comparable studies was not consistent between or within malignant glioma cell lines. Drug discovery science performed on these models cannot reliably inform clinical translation. A consensus model of reporting can maximise reproducibility and consistency among in vitro studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBiasBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalGliomaHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMiceTemozolomideAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingTemozolomideCell cultureGBMGlioblastomaHigh grade gliomaTemodal

Identifiers

PMID34794398
PMCPMC8600737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.