Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2021
Peri-operative diaphragm ultrasound as a new method of recognizing post-operative residual curarization.
Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Muscular Function Recovery from General Anesthesia in 132 Patients Undergoing Surgery with Acceleromyography, Combined Acceleromyography, and Ultrasonography, and without Monitoring Muscular Function.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Trial
- Effect of sugammadex versus neostigmine/glycopyrrolate combination on peak expiratory flow rates in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Diaphragm excursion difference as an adjunct predictor marker of postoperative pulmonary complications in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective, observational study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Ultrasound assessment of diaphragmatic dysfunction in non-critically ill patients: relevant indicators and update.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Use of a combination of diaphragmatic ultrasound and muscle relaxation monitoring in predicting post-extubation adverse respiratory events among elderly patients in an anesthesia intensive care unit.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Article
- Correction to: Peri-operative diaphragm ultrasound as a new method of recognizing post-operative residual curarization.BMC anesthesiology · 2022Article
- Role of perioperative diaphragmatic point-of-care ultrasound in assessing postoperative pulmonary complications in brachial plexus repair surgeries with preexisting hemidiaphragm paresis: A prospective observational study.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of peri-operative diaphragm ultrasound in assessing post-operative residual curarization (PORC).
methodsPatients undergoing non-thoracic and non-abdominal surgery under general anaesthesia were enrolled from July 2019 to October 2019 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. A train-of-four ratio (TOFr) lower than 0.9 was considered as the gold standard for PORC. Diaphragm ultrasound parameters included diaphragmatic excursion (DE) and diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF) during quiet breathing (QB) and deep breathing (DB). The diaphragm excursion fraction (DEF) was calculated as the DE-QB divided by the DE-DB. The diaphragm excursion difference (DED) was defined as DE-DB minus DE-QB. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the cut-off values of ultrasound parameters for the prediction of PORC.
resultsIn total, 75 patients were included, with a PORC incidence of 54.6%. The DE-DB and DED were positively correlated with the TOFr, while the DEF was negatively correlated with the TOFr. The DE-DB cut-off value for predicting PORC was 3.88 cm, with a sensitivity of 85.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 70.1-93.9%), specificity of 64.7% (95% CI: 46.4-79.7%), positive likelihood ratio of 2.42 (95% CI 1.5-3.9), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.23 (95% CI: 0.1-0.5). The DED cut-off value was 1.5 cm, with a specificity of 94.2% (95% CI: 80.3-99.3%), sensitivity of 63.4% (95% CI: 46.9-77.9%), positive likelihood ratio of 10.78 (95% CI: 2.8-42.2), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.39 (95% CI: 0.3-0.6).
conclusionsPeri-operative diaphragm ultrasound may be an additional method aiding the recognition of PORC, with DED having high specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.