Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34794389›Full record

Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2021

Peri-operative diaphragm ultrasound as a new method of recognizing post-operative residual curarization.

Jiaxin Lang, Yuchao Liu, Yuelun Zhang, Yuguang Huang, Jie Yi

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiaxin LangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, No 1, Shuaifuyan, Dongcheng district, Beijing, 100730, China.
Yuchao LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, No 1, Shuaifuyan, Dongcheng district, Beijing, 100730, China.
Yuelun ZhangMedical Research Center, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, 100730, China.
Yuguang HuangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, No 1, Shuaifuyan, Dongcheng district, Beijing, 100730, China.
Jie YiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, No 1, Shuaifuyan, Dongcheng district, Beijing, 100730, China. easyue@163.com.
Peking Union Medical College Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of peri-operative diaphragm ultrasound in assessing post-operative residual curarization (PORC).

methodsPatients undergoing non-thoracic and non-abdominal surgery under general anaesthesia were enrolled from July 2019 to October 2019 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. A train-of-four ratio (TOFr) lower than 0.9 was considered as the gold standard for PORC. Diaphragm ultrasound parameters included diaphragmatic excursion (DE) and diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF) during quiet breathing (QB) and deep breathing (DB). The diaphragm excursion fraction (DEF) was calculated as the DE-QB divided by the DE-DB. The diaphragm excursion difference (DED) was defined as DE-DB minus DE-QB. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the cut-off values of ultrasound parameters for the prediction of PORC.

resultsIn total, 75 patients were included, with a PORC incidence of 54.6%. The DE-DB and DED were positively correlated with the TOFr, while the DEF was negatively correlated with the TOFr. The DE-DB cut-off value for predicting PORC was 3.88 cm, with a sensitivity of 85.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 70.1-93.9%), specificity of 64.7% (95% CI: 46.4-79.7%), positive likelihood ratio of 2.42 (95% CI 1.5-3.9), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.23 (95% CI: 0.1-0.5). The DED cut-off value was 1.5 cm, with a specificity of 94.2% (95% CI: 80.3-99.3%), sensitivity of 63.4% (95% CI: 46.9-77.9%), positive likelihood ratio of 10.78 (95% CI: 2.8-42.2), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.39 (95% CI: 0.3-0.6).

conclusionsPeri-operative diaphragm ultrasound may be an additional method aiding the recognition of PORC, with DED having high specificity.

Indexed as

AdultAnesthesia, GeneralDelayed Emergence from AnesthesiaDiaphragmFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuromuscular MonitoringProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyYoung AdultDiagnostic testDiaphragm ultrasoundNeuromuscular monitorPost-operative residual CurarizationTrain-of-four

Identifiers

PMID34794389
PMCPMC8603586
OpenAlexW3211847737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.