Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34794206›Full record

ArticleCancer science2022

TAS-116 (pimitespib), a heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, shows efficacy in preclinical models of adult T-cell leukemia.

Emi Ikebe, Shunsuke Shimosaki, Hiroo Hasegawa, Hidekatsu Iha, Yoshiyuki Tsukamoto, Yu Wang, Daisuke Sasaki, Yoshitaka Imaizumi, Yasushi Miyazaki, Katsunori Yanagihara and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The role of heat shock protein 90 in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: state of the art.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Emi IkebeDepartment of Microbiology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu, Japan.
Shunsuke ShimosakiDivision of Tumor and Cellular Biochemistry, Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan.
Hiroo HasegawaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1822-5692
Hidekatsu IhaDepartment of Microbiology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu, Japan.
Yoshiyuki TsukamotoDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu, Japan.
Yu WangDepartment of Microbiology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu, Japan.
Daisuke SasakiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Yoshitaka ImaizumiDepartment of Hematology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2954-5691
Yasushi MiyazakiDepartment of Hematology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3683-7147
Katsunori YanagiharaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Isao HamaguchiDepartment of Safety Research on Blood and Biological Products, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhiro MorishitaDivision of Tumor and Cellular Biochemistry, Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2245-9950
Nagasaki University Hospital · JPOita University · JPUniversity of Miyazaki · JPNational Institute of Infectious Diseases · JP

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development 20fk0108124h2001Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 15K08647Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18H02733Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23590641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) is a highly chemoresistant malignancy of peripheral T lymphocytes caused by human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 infection, for which there is an urgent need for more effective therapeutic options. The molecular chaperone heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) plays a crucial role in nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB)-mediated antiapoptosis in ATL cells, and HSP90 inhibitors are new candidate therapeutics for ATL. Accordingly, we investigated the anti-ATL effects of a novel oral HSP90 inhibitor, TAS-116 (pimitespib), and the mechanisms involved in ex vivo and in vivo preclinical models. TAS-116 achieved IC

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesCell CycleCells, CulturedCell SurvivalHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansLeukemia-Lymphoma, Adult T-CellMiceNF-kappa BPyrazolesSignal TransductionTumor BurdenXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsNF-kappa BpimitespibPyrazolesadult T-cell leukemia/lymphomadrug sensitivityheat shock proteinHTLV-1 infectionmicroarray analysis

Identifiers

PMID34794206
PMCPMC8819293
OpenAlexW3213845642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.