Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34794173›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2022

The Inventory of Physical Activity Barriers for Adults 50 Years and Older: Refinement and Validation.

Mariana Wingood, Salene M W Jones, Nancy M Gell, Jennifer S Brach, Denise M Peters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Incorporating Physical Activity Assessments and Behavior Change Techniques Into Geriatrics.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mariana WingoodDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1617-0031
Salene M W JonesPublic Health Science Division, Fred Hutch, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2140-5798
Nancy M GellDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
Jennifer S BrachDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Denise M PetersDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.

Funding

VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JENNIFER S BRACH · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
Vermont Center for Cardiovascular and Brain HealthP20GM135007 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI MARY CUSHMAN, MARK T NELSON · 2020 to 2026
$17.4M
MIDCAREER INVESTIGATOR AWARD IN TRANSLATIONAL PATIENT-ORIENTED RESEARCH IN AGINGK24AG057728 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BRACH, JENNIFER S · 2018 to 2022
$658k
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG057728NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM135007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesDue to health consequences associated with insufficient physical activity (PA), particularly among aging adults, health care providers should assess and address lack of PA participation. Addressing lack of PA means developing individualized PA prescriptions that incorporate solutions to PA participation barriers. Assessing PA participation barriers can be done through the Social Ecological Model-based Inventory of Physical Activity Barriers Scale (IPAB). This study aimed to refine the initial 40-item IPAB and determine its reliability and validity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsFive hundred and three community-dwelling adults 50 years and older completed a demographic and health questionnaire, the Physical Activity Vital Sign, the IPAB, and a feedback questionnaire. For scale refinement, half of the data were used for exploratory factor analysis and the other half for confirmatory factor analysis. The refined scale underwent reliability and validity assessment, including internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity.

resultsThe refined scale contains 27 items consisting of 7 factors and 1 stand-alone item: (a) environmental, (b) physical health, (c) PA-related motivation, (d) emotional health, (e) time, (f) skills, (g) social, and (h) energy (a stand-alone item). The 27-item IPAB has good internal consistency (alpha = 0.91) and high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99). The IPAB's mean scores were statistically different between those who met the recommended levels of PA and those who did not (p < .001). DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The information gathered through the IPAB can guide discussions related to PA participation barriers and develop individualized PA prescriptions that incorporate solutions to the identified barriers.

Indexed as

ExerciseMotivationFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth promotionMeasurementPrimary prevention

Identifiers

PMID34794173
PMCPMC9710241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.