Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34793522›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Impact of pre-operative breast magnetic resonance imaging on contralateral synchronous and metachronous breast cancer detection-A case control comparison study with 1468 primary operable breast cancer patients with mean follow-up of 102 months.

Wen-Pei Wu, Chih-Yu Chen, Chih-Wei Lee, Hwa-Koon Wu, Shou-Tung Chen, Yu-Ting Wu, Ying-Jen Lin, Dar-Ren Chen, Shou-Jen Kuo, Hung-Wen Lai

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The Evolution and Clinical Impact of Deep Learning Technologies in Breast MRI.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wen-Pei WuDepartment of Medical Imaging, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4808-160X
Chih-Yu ChenDivision of Medical Imaging, Yuanlin Christian Hospital, Yuanlin, Taiwan.
Chih-Wei LeeDepartment of Medical Imaging, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Hwa-Koon WuDepartment of Medical Imaging, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Shou-Tung ChenEndoscopic & Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Center, Department of Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Yu-Ting WuDepartment of Surgery, Wuri Lin Shin Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Ying-Jen LinTumor Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Dar-Ren ChenDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Shou-Jen KuoDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Hung-Wen LaiKaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9541-2013
Changhua Christian Hospital · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTaichung Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with unilateral breast cancer are at an increased risk for the development of contralateral breast cancers. We hypothesis that combined breast MRI would detect more contralateral synchronous breast cancer than conventional imaging alone, and resulted in less contralateral metachronous breast cancer during follow-up.

methodsWe retrospectively collected two groups of breast cancer patients diagnosed from 2009 to 2013 for evaluating the effectiveness and value of adding pre-operative breast MRI to conventional breast images (mammography and sonography) for detection of contralateral synchronous breast cancer. The new metachronous contralateral breast cancer diagnosed during follow-up was prospectively evaluated and compared.

resultsGroup A (n = 733) comprised patients who underwent conventional preoperative imaging and group B (n = 735) combined with MRI were enrolled and compared. Seventy (9.5%) of the group B patients were found to have contralateral lesions detected by breast MRI, and 65.7% of these lesions only visible with MRI. The positive predictive value of breast MRI detected contralateral lesions was 48.8%. With the addition of breast MRI to conventional imaging studies, more surgical excisions were performed in contralateral breasts (6% (44/735) versus 1.4% (10/733), P< 0.01), more synchronous contralateral breast cancer detected (2.9% (21/735) versus 1.1% (8/733), P = 0.02), and resulted in numerical less (2.2% (16/714) versus 3% (22/725), p = 0.3) metachronous contralateral breast cancer during a mean follow-up of 102 months.

conclusionsOur study provides useful estimates of the pre-operative breast MRI for the increased detection of contralateral synchronous breast cancer and less subsequent contralateral metachronous breast cancer.

Indexed as

AdultBreastBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMammographyMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Multiple PrimaryNeoplasms, Second PrimaryPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID34793522
PMCPMC8601561
OpenAlexW3211468854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.