Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34793495›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Effect of after action review on safety culture and second victim experience and its implementation in an Irish hospital: A mixed methods study protocol.

Siobhán E McCarthy, Theresa Keane, Aisling Walsh, Lisa Mellon, David J Williams, Loretta Jenkins, Catherine Hogan, Cornelia Stuart, Natasha Rafter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Siobhán E McCarthyGraduate School of Healthcare Management, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5651-2409
Theresa KeaneGraduate School of Healthcare Management, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Aisling WalshDivision of Population Health Sciences, Department of Epidemiology, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Lisa MellonDepartment of Psychology, Division of Population Health Sciences, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
David J WilliamsDepartment of Geriatric and Stroke Medicine, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Loretta JenkinsNational Quality Assurance and Verification Team, Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland.
Catherine HoganNational Quality Assurance and Verification Team, Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland.
Cornelia StuartNational Quality Assurance and Verification Team, Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland.
Natasha RafterDivision of Population Health Sciences, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Health Service Executive · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter Action Review is a form of facilitated team learning and review of events. The methodology originated in the United States Army and forms part of the Incident Management Framework in the Irish Health Services. After Action Review has been hypothesized to improve safety culture and the effect of patient safety events on staff (second victim experience) in health care settings. Yet little direct evidence exists to support this and its implementation has not been studied.

aimTo investigate the effect of After Action Review on safety culture and second victim experience and to examine After Action Review implementation in a hospital setting.

methodsA mixed methods study will be conducted at an Irish hospital. To assess the effect on safety culture and second victim experience, hospital staff will complete surveys before and twelve months after the introduction of After Action Review to the hospital (Hospital Survey on Safety Culture 2.0 and Second Victim Experience and Support Tool). Approximately one in twelve staff will be trained as After Action Review Facilitators using a simulation based training programme. Six months after the After Action Review training, focus groups will be conducted with a stratified random sample of the trained facilitators. These will explore enablers and barriers to implementation using the Theoretical Domains Framework. At twelve months, information will be collected from the trained facilitators and the hospital to establish the quality and resource implications of implementing After Action Review. DISCUSSION: The results of the study will directly inform local hospital decision-making and national and international approaches to incorporating After Action Review in hospitals and other healthcare settings.

Indexed as

HospitalsMedical Staff, HospitalOrganizational CultureSafety ManagementComputer SimulationHospital AdministrationHumansIrelandPatient Care TeamRisk Management

Identifiers

PMID34793495
PMCPMC8601442
OpenAlexW3212790965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.