ArticleACR open rheumatology2022
Optimization of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Implications for Improved Therapeutic Outcomes.
Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- In vitro assays for investigating the immunomodulatory properties of human mesenchymal stromal cells.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- Phenotypic alterations in articulating joint cells: Role of mechanically loaded MSC secretome.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell (hMSC) Donor Potency Selection for the "First in Cystic Fibrosis" Phase I Clinical Trial (CEASE-CF).Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSeropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that is rarely "cured." Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) are known to reduce inflammation and restore immune homeostasis. However, methods for predicting therapeutic hMSC potency have not been established. The goal of these studies was to use and refine an ex vivo functional assay that determines potency of hMSCs and can then be validated in clinical trials as a potency measure of hMSCs used therapeutically to treat RA.
methodsAllogeneic hMSCs were cytokine-stimulated, and a conditioned medium (CM) was harvested. The CM was tested for the potential to attenuate RA CD4+ T cell proliferation using suppression assays. Indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase (IDO) mRNA, and protein were quantified in hMSCs as a measure to compare hMSCs across (prior) studies.
resultsTo mimic a proinflammatory environment that resembles that in RA, interleukin-1(IL1β), tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), and interferon γ (IFNγ) (alone or in combination) were used to precondition hMSCs. Treating hMSCs with a combination of these cytokines generated a CM "secretome" that suppressed T cell proliferation between 70 and 83%. Forty-eight hours of cytokine preconditioning hMSCs was required to maximize this effect. T cell suppression positively correlated with increases in hMSC cellular IDO mRNA and protein.
conclusionBy standardizing assays to measure hMSC effects, their potency on T cell suppression can be quantified. These studies demonstrate that hMSCs can be compared functionally to identify optimal preparation(s) for therapeutic use in RA and that the potency of hMSC-dependent T cell suppression may differ between hMSC donors. Clinical studies are warranted to validate the hypothesis that ex vivo potency in suppressing T cells will positively correlate with a reduction in RA disease activity and increase in immunological quiescence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.