Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34792817›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2022

Effects of 16 weeks of pyramidal and polarized training intensity distributions in well-trained endurance runners.

Luca Filipas, Matteo Bonato, Gabriele Gallo, Roberto Codella

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07498608 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Polarized and Threshold Intensity Distribution Models on Race Time and Body Composition in Recreational Runners Aged 20-45 Years: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Pedagogica Nacional, ColombiaRan2026 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsPhysical Activity, Physical Activity Intensity, Physical Activity in Adults, RunningArmsPolarized intensity distribution model, Threshold intensity distribution model
NCT07565168 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Polarized, Pyramidal, and Threshold Training Intensity Distribution on Physiological and Performance Outcomes in Recreational Distance Runners

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosRan2024 to 2026Enrolled24ConditionsEndurance Exercise, Exercise Physiology, Running PerformanceArmsPolarided training intensity distribution, Threshold Training Intensity Distribution, Pyramidal Training Intensity Distribution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luca FilipasDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3828-9626
Matteo BonatoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Gabriele GalloDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genoa, Italy.
Roberto CodellaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of four different training periodizations, based on two different training intensity distributions during a 16-week training block in well-trained endurance runners. Sixty well-trained male runners were divided into four groups. Each runner completed one of the following 16-week training interventions: a pyramidal periodization (PYR); a polarized periodization (POL); a pyramidal periodization followed by a polarized periodization (PYR → POL); and a polarized periodization followed by a pyramidal periodization (POL → PYR). The PYR and POL groups trained with a pyramidal or polarized distribution for 16 weeks. To allow for the change in periodization for the PYR → POL and POL → PYR groups, the 16-week intervention was split into two 8-week phases, starting with pyramidal or polarized distribution and then switching to the other. The periodization patterns were isolated manipulations of training intensity distribution, while training load was kept constant. Participants were tested pre-, mid- and post-intervention for body mass, velocity at 2 and 4 mmol·L

Indexed as

Physical EnduranceRunningHeart RateHumansLactic AcidMaleNutritional StatusOxygen ConsumptionLactic Acidpolarized trainingpyramidal trainingrunning performancetraining intensity distributiontraining periodization

Identifiers

PMID34792817
PMCPMC9299127
OpenAlexW3213367177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.