Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34792787›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2022

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Dose Optimization of Cefiderocol during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

Eric Wenzler, David Butler, Xing Tan, Takayuki Katsube, Toshihiro Wajima

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  7. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  8. Novel Antibiotics for Gram-Negative Nosocomial Pneumonia.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Novel Antimicrobial Agents for Gram-Negative Pathogens.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eric WenzlerDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street, Room 164 (M/C 886), Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. wenzler@uic.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3914-8400
David ButlerDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street, Room 164 (M/C 886), Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Xing TanDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street, Room 164 (M/C 886), Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Takayuki KatsubeClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Toshihiro WajimaClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
University of Illinois Chicago · USShionogi (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe need for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in critically ill patients with serious infections is associated with clinical failure, emergence of resistance, and excess mortality. These poor outcomes are attributable in large part to subtherapeutic antimicrobial exposure and failure to achieve target pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) thresholds during CRRT. Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore cephalosporin with broad in vitro activity against resistant pathogens and is often used to treat critically ill patients, including those receiving CRRT, despite the lack of data to guide dosing in this population.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the PK and PD of cefiderocol during in vitro and in vivo CRRT and provide optimal dosing recommendations.

methodsThe PK and dialytic clearance of cefiderocol was evaluated via an established in vitro CRRT model across various modes, filter types, and effluent flow rates. These data were combined with in vivo PK data from nine patients receiving cefiderocol while receiving CRRT from phase III clinical trials. Optimal dosing regimens and their respective probability of target attainment (PTA) were assessed via an established population PK model with Bayesian estimation and 1000-subject Monte Carlo simulations at each effluent flow rate.

resultsThe overall mean sieving/saturation coefficient during in vitro CRRT was 0.90 across all modes, filter types, effluent flow rates, and points of replacement fluid dilution tested. Adsorption was negligible at 10.9%. Three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple linear regression analyses demonstrated that effluent flow rate is the primary driver of clearance during CRRT and can be used to calculate optimal cefiderocol doses required to match the systemic exposure observed in patients with normal renal function. Bayesian estimation of these effluent flow rate-based optimal doses in nine patients receiving CRRT from the phase III clinical trials of cefiderocol revealed comparable mean (± standard deviation) area under the concentration-time curve values as patients with normal renal function (1709 ± 539 mg·h/L vs. 1494 ± 58.4 mg·h/L; p = 0.26). Monte Carlo simulations confirmed these doses achieved >90% PTA against minimum inhibitory concentrations ≤4 mg/L at effluent flow rates from 0.5 to 5 L/h.

conclusionThe optimal dosing regimens developed from this work have been incorporated into the prescribing information for cefiderocol, making it the first and only antimicrobial with labeled dosing for CRRT. Future clinical studies are warranted to confirm the efficacy and safety of these regimens.

Indexed as

Continuous Renal Replacement TherapyAnti-Bacterial AgentsBayes TheoremCefiderocolCephalosporinsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCritical IllnessHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRenal Replacement TherapyAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefiderocolCephalosporins

Identifiers

PMID34792787
PMCPMC9167810
OpenAlexW3211858115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.