ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022
Synthetic OCT data in challenging conditions: three-dimensional OCT and presence of abnormalities.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ethical considerations in generative artificial intelligence for synthetic data generation in ophthalmology.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Data augmentation for generating synthetic electrogastrogram time series.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- A Clinician's Guide to Sharing Data for AI in Ophthalmology.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Review
- OIMHS: An Optical Coherence Tomography Image Dataset Based on Macular Hole Manual Segmentation.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Synthetic OCT Data Generation to Enhance the Performance of Diagnostic Models for Neurodegenerative Diseases.Translational vision science & technology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nowadays, retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) plays an important role in ophthalmology and automatic analysis of the OCT is of real importance: image denoising facilitates a better diagnosis and image segmentation and classification are undeniably critical in treatment evaluation. Synthetic OCT was recently considered to provide a benchmark for quantitative comparison of automatic algorithms and to be utilized in the training stage of novel solutions based on deep learning. Due to complicated data structure in retinal OCTs, a limited number of delineated OCT datasets are already available in presence of abnormalities; furthermore, the intrinsic three-dimensional (3D) structure of OCT is ignored in many public 2D datasets. We propose a new synthetic method, applicable to 3D data and feasible in presence of abnormalities like diabetic macular edema (DME). In this method, a limited number of OCT data is used during the training step and the Active Shape Model is used to produce synthetic OCTs plus delineation of retinal boundaries and location of abnormalities. Statistical comparison of thickness maps showed that synthetic dataset can be used as a statistically acceptable representative of the original dataset (p > 0.05). Visual inspection of the synthesized vessels was also promising. Regarding the texture features of the synthesized datasets, Q-Q plots were used, and even in cases that the points have slightly digressed from the straight line, the p-values of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test rejected the null hypothesis and showed the same distribution in texture features of the real and the synthetic data. The proposed algorithm provides a unique benchmark for comparison of OCT enhancement methods and a tailored augmentation method to overcome the limited number of OCTs in deep learning algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.