Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34792725›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2022

Intraoperative irradiation in breast cancer: preliminary results in 80 patients as partial breast irradiation or anticipated boost prior to hypo-fractionated whole breast irradiation.

X Li, J Sanz, N Argudo, M Vernet-Tomas, N Rodríguez, L Torrent, E Fernández-Velilla, O Pera, Y Huang, P Nicolau and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) in Taiwanese breast cancer patients: factors influencing local relapse risk and disease-free survival.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

X LiAutonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
J SanzPompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain. jsanz@psmar.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2296-9659
N ArgudoBreast Unit, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
M Vernet-TomasBreast Unit, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
N RodríguezPompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain.
L TorrentBreast Unit, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
E Fernández-VelillaRadiation Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, C/. Del Gas s/n Edificio B, sótano-2, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
O PeraRadiation Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, C/. Del Gas s/n Edificio B, sótano-2, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Y HuangAutonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
P NicolauBreast Unit, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
M JiménezBreast Unit, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
M SeguraBreast Unit, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
M AlgaraAutonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo present the first results of intraoperative irradiation (IORT) in breast cancer with a low-energy photon system used as partial breast irradiation (PBI) or as an anticipated boost before whole breast hypo-fractionated irradiation (IORT + WBI), concerning tolerance, side effects, quality of life, and patient-reported outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsEighty patients treated with an Intrabeam

resultsThirty-one patients were treated as PBI and the remaining 49 as IORT + WBI. Only the IORT + WBI group presented acute toxicity, mainly mild acute dermatitis (11 patients) and one subacute mastitis. A total of 20 patients presented fibrosis (18 patients grade I, 2 patients grade II), 15 (30.5%) patients in the IORT + WBI group and 3 (9.6%) patients in the group of PBI. The cosmesis evaluation in 73 patients resulted poor, fair, good or excellent in 2, 7, 38 and 26 patients, respectively. In PBI group Breast-Q scored higher, especially in terms of their psychosocial well-being (78 vs 65) and satisfaction with radiation-induced toxicity (77 vs 72, respectively) compared to IORT + WBI group.

conclusionIORT is a well-tolerated procedure with low toxicity, good cosmesis and favorable patient-reported outcomes mainly when administered as PBI.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsRadiation InjuriesBreastFemaleHumansMastectomy, SegmentalQuality of LifeRadiation Dose HypofractionationRadiotherapy, AdjuvantBoostBreast cancerHypofractionationIntraoperative irradiationPartial breast irradiationPatient reported outcomes

Identifiers

PMID34792725
PMCPMC9013337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.