Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34792711›Full record

ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2022

Veritable Untruths: Autistic Traits and the Processing of Deception.

Wei Li, Hannah Rohde, Martin Corley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wei LiPsychology, PPLS, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, UK.
Hannah RohdeLinguistics and English Language, PPLS, University of Edinburgh, Dugald Stewart Building, Edinburgh, EH8 9AD, UK.
Martin CorleyPsychology, PPLS, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, UK. Martin.Corley@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7011-428X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How do we decide whether a statement is literally true? Here, we contrast participants' eventual evaluations of a speaker's meaning with the real-time processes of comprehension. We record participants' eye movements as they respond to potentially misleading instructions to click on one of two objects which might be concealing treasure (the treasure is behind thee, uh, hat). Participants are less likely to click on the named object when the instructions are disfluent. However, when hearing disfluent utterances, a tendency to fixate the named object early increases with participants' autism quotient scores. This suggests that, even where utterances are equivalently understood, the processes by which interpretations are achieved vary across individuals.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderComprehensionDeceptionEye MovementsHumansAutism spectrum quotientDisfluencyEye-tracking

Identifiers

PMID34792711
PMCPMC9556339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.