Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34792700›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2022

Accuracy of H. pylori fecal antigen test using fecal immunochemical test (FIT).

S A V Nieuwenburg, M C Mommersteeg, L M M Wolters, A J van Vuuren, N Erler, M P Peppelenbosch, G M Fuhler, M J Bruno, E J Kuipers, M C W Spaander

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Social determinants of health andFrontiers in public health · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Clinical Utility ofInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S A V NieuwenburgDepartments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center's, (Room Na-610) Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M C MommersteegDepartments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center's, (Room Na-610) Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
L M M WoltersDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
A J van VuurenDepartments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center's, (Room Na-610) Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
N ErlerDepartment of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M P PeppelenboschDepartments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center's, (Room Na-610) Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
G M FuhlerDepartments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center's, (Room Na-610) Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M J BrunoDepartments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center's, (Room Na-610) Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
E J KuipersDepartments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center's, (Room Na-610) Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M C W SpaanderDepartments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center's, (Room Na-610) Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. v.spaander@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-9103-9757
Erasmus MC · NLAlbert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric and colorectal cancer (CRC) are both one of the most common cancers worldwide. In many countries fecal immunochemical tests (FIT)-based CRC screening has been implemented. We investigated if FIT can also be applied for detection of H. pylori, the main risk factor for gastric cancer.

methodsThis prospective study included participants over 18 years of age referred for urea breath test (UBT). Patients were excluded if they had used antibiotics/bismuth in the past 4 weeks, or a proton pomp inhibitor (PPI) in the past 2 weeks. Participants underwent UBT, ELISA stool antigen test in standard feces tube (SAT), ELISA stool antigen test in FIT tube (Hp-FIT), and blood sampling, and completed a questionnaire on user friendliness. UBT results were used as reference.

resultsA total of 182 patients were included (37.4% male, median age 52.4 years (IQR 22.4)). Of these, 60 (33.0%) tested H. pylori positive. SAT and Hp-FIT showed comparable overall accuracy 71.1% (95%CI 63.2-78.3) vs. 77.6% (95%CI 70.4-83.8), respectively (p = 0.97). Sensitivity of SAT was 91.8% (95%CI 80.4-97.7) versus 94.2% (95%CI 84.1-98.9) of Hp-FIT (p = 0.98). Serology scored low with an overall accuracy of 49.7% (95%CI 41.7-57.7). Hp-FIT showed the highest overall user convenience.

conclusionsFIT can be used with high accuracy and sensitivity for diagnosis of H. pylori and is rated as the most convenient test. Non-invasive Hp-FIT test is highly promising for combined upper and lower gastrointestinal (pre-) cancerous screening. Further research should investigate the clinical implications, benefits and cost-effectiveness of such an approach.

Indexed as

Helicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriStomach NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultFecesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityCancerFecal immunochemical testH. pyloriScreening

Identifiers

PMID34792700
PMCPMC8882108
OpenAlexW3213973369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.