Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34792699›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2022

Analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigenic tests for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in hospital outbreak situation.

Jesús María Aranaz-Andrés, Abelardo Claudio Fernández Chávez, Amaranta McGee Laso, Melanie Abreu, Paloma Moreno Núñez, Juan Carlos Galán, Rafael Cantón Moreno

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. The Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Antigen Testing (January 2023).Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jesús María Aranaz-AndrésPreventive Medicine and Public Health, Hospital Universitario Ramón Y Cajal and Instituto Ramón Y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.
Abelardo Claudio Fernández ChávezPreventive Medicine and Public Health, Hospital Universitario Ramón Y Cajal and Instituto Ramón Y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.
Amaranta McGee LasoPreventive Medicine and Public Health, Hospital Universitario Ramón Y Cajal and Instituto Ramón Y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain. amarantamcgee@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4524-0484
Melanie AbreuServicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón Y Cajal and Instituto Ramón Y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), 28034, Madrid, Spain.
Paloma Moreno NúñezPreventive Medicine and Public Health, Hospital Universitario Ramón Y Cajal and Instituto Ramón Y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.
Juan Carlos GalánCIBER Epidemiología Y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Rafael Cantón MorenoServicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón Y Cajal and Instituto Ramón Y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), 28034, Madrid, Spain.
Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) continues to be the reference diagnostic method for the confirmation of COVID-19 cases; however, rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) have recently been developed. The purpose of the study is to assess the performance of rapid antigen-based COVID-19 testing in the context of hospital outbreaks. This was an observational, cross-sectional study. The study period was from October 2020 to January 2021. The "Panbio COVID-19 AG" RADT (Abbott) was performed and TaqPath COVID-19 test RT-PCR. The samples were obtained from hospitalised patients in suspected outbreak situations at the Ramón y Cajal Hospital. A hospital outbreak was defined as the presence of 3 or more epidemiologically linked cases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the RADT were calculated using RT-PCR as a reference. A total of 17 hospital outbreaks were detected in 11 hospital units during the study period, in which 34 RT-PCR and RADT screenings were performed. We obtained 541 samples, which were analysed with RT-PCR and a further 541 analysed with RADT. Six RADT tests gave conflicting results with the RT-PCR, 5 of them with a negative RADT and positive RT-PCR and one with positive RADT and a negative RT-PCR. The sensitivity of the RADT was 83.3% (65.3-94.4%) and the specificity was 99.8% (98.9-100%). The PPV was 96.2% (80.4-99.9%) and the NPV was 99% (97.7-99.7%). The RADT shows good diagnostic performance in patients on non-COVID-19 hospital wards, in the context of an outbreak.

Indexed as

PandemicsAntigens, ViralCOVID-19 Serological TestingCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHumansSensitivity and SpecificitySpainAntigens, ViralAsymptomatic screeningCOVID-19Rapid antigen tests

Identifiers

PMID34792699
PMCPMC8600491
OpenAlexW3212555895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.