Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34792589›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Earlier Detection of Cognitive Decline From Clinical Notes in Electronic Health Records.

Liqin Wang, John Laurentiev, Jie Yang, Ying-Chih Lo, Rebecca E Amariglio, Deborah Blacker, Reisa A Sperling, Gad A Marshall, Li Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Accelerating real-world prediction and research in Alzheimer's: The M3AD study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Wrist Joint Injury Diagnosis.International journal of medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Enhancing healthcare access for an older population: The age-friendly emergency department.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Liqin WangDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
John LaurentievDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jie YangSchool of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Ying-Chih LoDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rebecca E AmariglioDepartment of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Deborah BlackerDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health and Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Reisa A SperlingDepartment of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Gad A MarshallDepartment of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Li ZhouDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USZhejiang University · CN

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG062421 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI STEVEN E ARNOLD · 2019 to 2026
$36.5M
COVID-19 and Acute Medical Care: Impact on Dementia PatientsR01AG062282 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HSU, JOHN · 2018 to 2022
$4.5M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062421NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Detecting cognitive decline earlier among older adults can facilitate enrollment in clinical trials and early interventions. Clinical notes in longitudinal electronic health records (EHRs) provide opportunities to detect cognitive decline earlier than it is noted in structured EHR fields as formal diagnoses. Objective: To develop and validate a deep learning model to detect evidence of cognitive decline from clinical notes in the EHR. Design, Setting, and Participants: Notes documented 4 years preceding the initial mild cognitive impairment (MCI) diagnosis were extracted from Mass General Brigham's Enterprise Data Warehouse for patients aged 50 years or older and with initial MCI diagnosis during 2019. The study was conducted from March 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021. Sections of notes for cognitive decline were labeled manually and 2 reference data sets were created. Data set I contained a random sample of 4950 note sections filtered by a list of keywords related to cognitive functions and was used for model training and testing. Data set II contained 2000 randomly selected sections without keyword filtering for assessing whether the model performance was dependent on specific keywords. Main Outcomes and Measures: A deep learning model and 4 baseline models were developed and their performance was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC). Results: Data set I represented 1969 patients (1046 [53.1%] women; mean [SD] age, 76.0 [13.3] years). Data set II comprised 1161 patients (619 [53.3%] women; mean [SD] age, 76.5 [10.2] years). With some overlap of patients deleted, the unique population was 2166. Cognitive decline was noted in 1453 sections (29.4%) in data set I and 69 sections (3.45%) in data set II. Compared with the 4 baseline models, the deep learning model achieved the best performance in both data sets, with AUROC of 0.971 (95% CI, 0.967-0.976) and AUPRC of 0.933 (95% CI, 0.921-0.944) for data set I and AUROC of 0.997 (95% CI, 0.994-0.999) and AUPRC of 0.929 (95% CI, 0.870-0.969) for data set II. Conclusions and Relevance: In this diagnostic study, a deep learning model accurately detected cognitive decline from clinical notes preceding MCI diagnosis and had better performance than keyword-based search and other machine learning models. These results suggest that a deep learning model could be used for earlier detection of cognitive decline in the EHRs.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEarly DiagnosisAgedAged, 80 and overCognitive DysfunctionElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMassachusettsMiddle AgedRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID34792589
PMCPMC8603078
OpenAlexW3214401235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.