ArticleJAMA network open2021
Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Digital System for Histologic Classification of Colorectal Polyps.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancements in Image-Based Analyses for Morphology and Staging of Colon Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.BioMed research international · 2025Pooled it
- Bridging the Precancerous Gap in Colorectal Cancer Through AI-Enhanced Liquid Biopsy, Endoscopy, and Digital Pathology.Cancers · 2026Review
- [Artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostics in the pathology of internal and oncological diseases].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- LPA-Tuning CLIP: An Improved CLIP-Based Classification Model for Intestinal Polyps.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening and Risk Assessment through Predictive Modeling on Medical Images and Records.The American journal of pathology · 2026Article
- ADPv2: A hierarchical histological tissue type-annotated dataset for potential biomarker discovery of colorectal disease.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Predicting targeted therapy resistance in non-small cell lung cancer using multimodal machine learning.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- A knowledge-based clinical decision support system for personalized health examination items in China: design and evaluation.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Ethical challenges and evolving strategies in the integration of artificial intelligence into clinical practice.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Article
- Masked pre-training of transformers for histology image analysis.Journal of pathology informatics · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence in digital pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Review
- Recognition of Colon Polyps (Tubular Adenoma, Villous Adenoma) and Normal Colon Epithelium Histomorphology with Transfer Learning.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2024Article
- Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Histologic Classification of Pancreatic Cancer.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2023Article
- Automation in Contemporary Clinical Information Systems: a Survey of AI in Healthcare Settings.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2023Article
- Detection of Colorectal Adenocarcinoma and Grading Dysplasia on Histopathologic Slides Using Deep Learning.The American journal of pathology · 2023Article
- HistoPerm: A permutation-based view generation approach for improving histopathologic feature representation learning.Journal of pathology informatics · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Powered Whole-Slide Image Analyzer Reveals a Distinctive Distribution of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Colorectal polyps are common, and their histopathologic classification is used in the planning of follow-up surveillance. Substantial variation has been observed in pathologists' classification of colorectal polyps, and improved assessment by pathologists may be associated with reduced subsequent underuse and overuse of colonoscopy. Objective: To compare standard microscopic assessment with an artificial intelligence (AI)-augmented digital system that annotates regions of interest within digitized polyp tissue and predicts polyp type using a deep learning model to assist pathologists in colorectal polyp classification. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this diagnostic study conducted at a tertiary academic medical center and a community hospital in New Hampshire, 100 slides with colorectal polyp samples were read by 15 pathologists using a microscope and an AI-augmented digital system, with a washout period of at least 12 weeks between use of each modality. The study was conducted from February 10 to July 10, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Accuracy and time of evaluation were used to compare pathologists' performance when a microscope was used with their performance when the AI-augmented digital system was used. Outcomes were compared using paired t tests and mixed-effects models. Results: In assessments of 100 slides with colorectal polyp specimens, use of the AI-augmented digital system significantly improved pathologists' classification accuracy compared with microscopic assessment from 73.9% (95% CI, 71.7%-76.2%) to 80.8% (95% CI, 78.8%-82.8%) (P < .001). The overall difference in the evaluation time per slide between the digital system (mean, 21.7 seconds; 95% CI, 20.8-22.7 seconds) and microscopic examination (mean, 13.0 seconds; 95% CI, 12.4-13.5 seconds) was -8.8 seconds (95% CI, -9.8 to -7.7 seconds), but this difference decreased as pathologists became more familiar and experienced with the digital system; the difference between the time of evaluation on the last set of 20 slides for all pathologists when using the microscope and the digital system was 4.8 seconds (95% CI, 3.0-6.5 seconds). Conclusions and Relevance: In this diagnostic study, an AI-augmented digital system significantly improved the accuracy of pathologic interpretation of colorectal polyps compared with microscopic assessment. If applied broadly to clinical practice, this tool may be associated with decreases in subsequent overuse and underuse of colonoscopy and thus with improved patient outcomes and reduced health care costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.