ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2022
Atrial-paced, exercise-similar heart rate envelope induces myocardial protection from ischaemic injury.
Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preventing Site-Specific Calpain Proteolysis of Junctophilin-2 Protects Against Stress-Induced Excitation-Contraction Uncoupling and Heart Failure Development.Circulation · 2025Article
- Myokine Musclin Is Critical for Exercise-Induced Cardiac Conditioning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe study investigates the role and mechanisms of clinically translatable exercise heart rate (HR) envelope effects, without dyssynchrony, on myocardial ischaemia tolerance compared to standard preconditioning methods. Since the magnitude and duration of exercise HR acceleration are tightly correlated with beneficial cardiac outcomes, it is hypothesized that a paced exercise-similar HR envelope, delivered in a maximally physiologic way that avoids the toxic effects of chamber dyssynchrony, may be more than simply a readout, but rather also a significant trigger of myocardial conditioning and stress resistance. METHODS AND
resultsFor 8 days over 2 weeks, sedated mice were atrial-paced once daily via an oesophageal electrode to deliver an exercise-similar HR pattern with preserved atrioventricular and interventricular synchrony. Effects on cardiac calcium handling, protein expression/modification, and tolerance to ischaemia-reperfusion (IR) injury were assessed and compared to those in sham-paced mice and to the effects of exercise and ischaemic preconditioning (IPC). The paced cohort displayed improved myocardial IR injury tolerance vs. sham controls with an effect size similar to that afforded by treadmill exercise or IPC. Hearts from paced mice displayed changes in Ca2+ handling, coupled with changes in phosphorylation of calcium/calmodulin protein kinase II, phospholamban and ryanodine receptor channel, and transcriptional remodelling associated with a cardioprotective paradigm.
conclusionsThe HR pattern of exercise, delivered by atrial pacing that preserves intracardiac synchrony, induces cardiac conditioning and enhances ischaemic stress resistance. This identifies the HR pattern as a signal for conditioning and suggests the potential to repurpose atrial pacing for cardioprotection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.