Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34792107›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of surgery2021

Early response to upfront neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CAPOX) alone in low- and intermediate-risk rectal cancer: a single-arm phase II trial.

Xiangbing Deng, Qingbin Wu, Liang Bi, Yongyang Yu, Shuo Huang, Du He, Bing Wu, Hongfeng Gou, Wenjian Meng, Meng Qiu and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03666442 (Early Evaluation of Chemosensitivity for Low-risk Stage II/III Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03666442 phase2completednot on this map

Early Evaluation of Chemosensitivity for Low-risk Stage II/III Rectal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorWest China HospitalRan2018 to 2022Enrolled61ConditionsRectal CancerArmsXELOX
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiangbing DengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Qingbin WuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8149-5989
Liang BiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yongyang YuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Shuo HuangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Du HeDepartment of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Bing WuDepartment of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hongfeng GouDepartment of Abdominal Cancer, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wenjian MengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4578-0560
Meng QiuDepartment of Abdominal Cancer, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yazhou HeDepartment of Oncology, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2358-0143
Ziqiang WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9785-9222
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith local recurrence of rectal cancer continuing to decrease, distant recurrence is becoming a major concern, especially for patients with low- and intermediate-risk stage II/III rectal cancer. Therefore, a new treatment strategy is warranted for these patients. This single-arm phase II trial aimed to assess the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in low- and intermediate-risk stage II/III rectal cancer and explore candidate radiological and clinical parameters for early prediction of tumour response after two cycles of CAPOX.

methodsPatients with mid-low stage II/III rectal cancer with low and intermediate risk were examined. The primary outcome was defined as a clinicopathological response by integrating tumour longitudinal length reduction (TLLR) on MRI into pathological tumour regression grade (TRG). After completing NCT, patients with TRG0-2 and TRG3 with a TLLR rate greater than 30 per cent were considered to be responders. Secondary outcomes included pathological complete response (pCR), adverse events and local and distant recurrence.

resultsThis study enrolled 61 eligible patients. No patient was converted to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy owing to tumour progression. The clinicopathological response and pCR rates were 78.7 and 21.3 per cent respectively. After two cycles of CAPOX, TLLR, TRG on MRI, and mucosal lesion regression grade on endoscopy had potential discriminative ability (area under the curve greater than 0.7) for predicting both clinicopathological and pathological response.

conclusionNCT alone achieves good tumour response rates in patients with low- and intermediate-risk stage II/III rectal cancer, and predicting tumour response to NCT is feasible at an early treatment phase. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03666442 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOxaliplatinRectal NeoplasmsRemission InductionRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeCapecitabineOxaliplatin

Identifiers

PMID34792107
PMCPMC10364694
OpenAlexW3211824848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.